February 2012 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2151] New: Review request: perle-serial-kmod - Perle Serial PCI card kernel module(s)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2151 Bug #: 2151 Summary: Review request: perle-serial-kmod - Perle Serial PCI card kernel module(s) Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: philipp(a)redfish-solutions.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Perle Systems makes several PCI and PCIe serial cards, but there support for linux 2.6 and 3.x is lacking. This package patches their driver tarball and builds it as per rpmfusion as kmod. ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/pub/perle-serial-kmod.spec ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/pub/perle-serial-kmod-3.8.0-6.1.fc16.1.sr... == description == This package provides a driver for the family of Perle serial cards. The cards supported are: Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, 8i, and 16 cards Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, 8i, and 16 SI cards Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, and 8i Express cards Perle PCI-RAS V.92 (4 and 8 port) cards Perle Speed1, 2, 4, and 8 LE cards Read /usr/share/doc/perle-serial/README for more info. ==== This is a kmod package, and as such can't be included in Fedora. ==== $ rpmlint perle-serial-kmod.spec perle-serial-kmod.spec:44: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 44, tab: line 6) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ The spaces come as a result of cut&paste of taking the description directly from upstream files. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/*perle-serial* kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C perle-serial kernel module(s) for 3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64 kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64/extra/perle-serial/perle-serial.ko kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-perle-serial.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage kmod-perle-serial.x86_64: W: no-documentation perle-serial-kmod-common.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) userland -> user land, user-land, slanderous perle-serial-kmod-common.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Userland -> User land, User-land, Slanderous perle-serial-kmod-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/perle-serial-kmod-3.8.0/_kmod_build_3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64/perle-serial.c 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings. $ "Userland" and "Metapackage" are legitimate words in this lexicon. The wrong FSF address in perle-serial.c is directly from the upstream sources. Kernel modules are unstripped (or they wouldn't load otherwise). The not capitalized warning applies to a string that's generated from a macro. The documentation is in the -common package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2190] New: Review request: AtomicParsley - Command-Line Program to Read and Set iTunes-style Metadata Tags

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2190 Bug #: 2190 Summary: Review request: AtomicParsley - Command-Line Program to Read and Set iTunes-style Metadata Tags Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: avi(a)unix.sh CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 RPM, SPEC and SRPM: http://avi.alkalay.net/software/atomicparsley/ AtomicParsley is a lightweight command line program that can read and set iTunes-style metadata tags in MPEG-4 files & 3gp assets in 3GPP/3GPP2 files. Maybe this package IS eligible to plain Fedora, please tell me. It doesn't have any special dependencies on non-plain-Fedora packages. Altought it manages proprietary MPEG-4 files, this software apparently does that through direct binary file manipulation. $ rpmlint SRPMS/AtomicParsley-0.9.0-7.fc16.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/AtomicParsley-0.9.0-7.fc16.x86_64.rpm AtomicParsley.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary AtomicParsley 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This is not my first package submission but previous packages never were approved mostly due to lack of sponsors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 2182] New: Package request for soundkonverter

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2182 Bug #: 2182 Summary: Package request for soundkonverter Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: chillermillerlong(a)hotmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Created attachment 807 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=807 spec file soundkonverter is a GPLv2 licensed audio conversion tool. It's similar to soundconverter in the main Fedora repos, except that it's extensible via plugins and supports a lot more backends. Website: http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=29024 I've created a spec file that adheres to the Fedora packaging guidelines as best as I could. The only thing I'm not sure about is the description. The spec and src.rpm is attached. Thanks in advance! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 2124] New: Review request: libva-xvba-driver - HW video decode support for XvBA platforms

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2124 Bug #: 2124 Summary: Review request: libva-xvba-driver - HW video decode support for XvBA platforms Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/libva-xvba-driver/libva-xvba-drive... SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/libva-xvba-driver/libva-xvba-drive... Summary: HW video decode support for XvBA platforms This package rely on the xorg-x11-drv-catalyst-devel, so this is for the nonfree section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 2144] New: Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG, DVB, IETF,

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2144 Bug #: 2144 Summary: Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG, DVB, IETF, Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/vlc/bitstream-1.0-1.fc16.src.rpm SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/vlc/bitstream.spec Summary: Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG, DVB, IETF, This is MPEG-2 related headers so fall under the RPM Fusion free section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2150] New: Review request: geom - SALOME Geometry Module

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2150 Bug #: 2150 Summary: Review request: geom - SALOME Geometry Module Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kmilos(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC: http://kmilos.fedorapeople.org/geom.spec SRPM: http://kmilos.fedorapeople.org/geom-6.3.1.8-1.svn222.fc16.src.rpm A complete OpenCascade - OCAF based CAD framework. Note that this is not the original SALOME GEOM project but an effort to create a standalone framework based on the existing one from SALOME project, with the addition of extra functionality. This package can not be included in Fedora because it links with the non-free OCE library. This is my first RPM Fusion package, however I packaged for Fedora before (redshift). rpmlint output: rpmlint geom*.rpm geom.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/geom-6.3.1.8/LICENCE.lgpl.txt geom.src: W: invalid-url Source0: geom-6.3.1.8-svn222.tar.gz geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/quat.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/chunk.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/node.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/node.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/vector.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/light.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/light.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/io.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/background.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/background.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/quat.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/atmosphere.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/atmosphere.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/tcb.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/mesh.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/mesh.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/io.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/chunk.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/tcb.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/matrix.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/matrix.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/types.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/vector.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/material.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/material.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/viewport.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/viewport.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/tracks.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/tracks.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/shadow.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/chunktable.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/ease.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/file.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/file.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/camera.h geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/shadow.c geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/camera.c geom-devel.i686: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 38 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
30
0 / 0

[Bug 2134] New: Review Request: pyspotify - Python bindings for libspotify

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2134 Bug #: 2134 Summary: Review Request: pyspotify - Python bindings for libspotify Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jdieter(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/pyspotify.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/pyspotify-1.6.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Python bindings for the official Spotify API Why not in Fedora: Requires libspotify which is proprietary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 2135] New: Review Request: mopidy - Music server that plays music from Spotify

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2135 Bug #: 2135 Summary: Review Request: mopidy - Music server that plays music from Spotify Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jdieter(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Depends on: 2133, 2134 Spec URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/mopidy.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/mopidy-0.6.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Mopidy is a music server that plays music from a user's Spotify account, given that the user has a Spotify Premium Account. Any MPD clients can connect and control the server -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 30] New: Tracker : Sponsorship Request

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Summary: Tracker : Sponsorship Request Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: lxtnow(a)gmail.com CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 This is a tracker bug for sponsorship requests in RPM Fusion. All new RPM Fusion contributors who need to be sponsored should block this bug. SPONSORS: When you accept the responsibility of sponsoring, please take it off of this list. Note: All members who already contribute to the Fedora Project (Packaging Side) no need to request for sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years

1
87
0 / 0

[Bug 351] New: Review request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351 Summary: Review request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dtimms(a)iinet.net.au CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requiremen... SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requiremen... Description: Use this package to install the packages required to run vmware locally. This package does not include the free vmware-server or vmware-server-console package itself. They can be obtained from the vmware website. Can't be in Fedora: - it's a meta package - it enables use of non fedora software - the proper packaging should really be done by the upstream author. - the upstream is not open source - the upstream do not support the fedora distribution - FESCO discussed it recently, and voted that helper packages for third party apps shall be blocked from Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007#c17 The original Fedora review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 FESCO item tracking: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/35 FESCO discussion should show up soon for 2009-01-30: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/fesco/ ===== rpmlint: vmware-requirements.src:34: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/security/pam_unix.so vmware-requirements.src:51: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 vmware-requirements.src:53: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:55: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXtst.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:57: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 vmware-requirements.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements.i386: E: no-binary vmware-requirements-server.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements-server.i386: E: devel-dependency kernel-devel 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 2 warnings. ===== So, do we want to allow helper packages like this in RPM Fusion ? Note it does not Require: any packages external to Fedora/RPM Fusion, nor does it attempt to download them. Others have mentioned that other external no source apps might include skype etc, that could receive similar RPM Fusion packaging assistance ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years

1
9
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers February 2012