January 2016 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2842] New: Review request: openssl-freeworld - Utilities from the general purpose cryptography library with TLS implementation

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842 Bug #: 2842 Summary: Review request: openssl-freeworld - Utilities from the general purpose cryptography library with TLS implementation Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jeffmendoza(a)live.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org http://jm-workhorse.cloudapp.net/rpmfusion/openssl-freeworld/openssl-free... http://jm-workhorse.cloudapp.net/rpmfusion/openssl-freeworld/openssl-free... This is the freeworld version of Fedora's openssl, which includes the EC cipher. The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between machines. OpenSSL includes a certificate management tool and shared libraries which provide various cryptographic algorithms and protocols. >From http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist Request: OpenSSL with Elliptic Curve, IDEA, MDC-2, RC5 crypto algorithms Summary: The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between machines. URL: http://www.openssl.org/ Why not in Fedora: Because of the problem with software patents: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901 Notes: OpenSSL is included in Fedora but with Elliptic Curve, IDEA, MDC-2, RC5 crypto algorithms disabled. rpmlint: srpm: openssl-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission make-dummy-cert 0755L openssl-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission renew-dummy-cert 0755L openssl-freeworld.src:159: W: macro-in-comment %patch40 openssl-freeworld.src:165: W: macro-in-comment %patch56 openssl-freeworld.src:166: W: macro-in-comment %patch58 openssl-freeworld.src:171: W: macro-in-comment %patch68 openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:278: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:278: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:278: W: macro-in-comment %{soversion} openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:280: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:280: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:280: W: macro-in-comment %{soversion} openssl-freeworld.src:415: W: macro-in-comment %attr openssl-freeworld.src:415: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:416: W: macro-in-comment %attr openssl-freeworld.src:416: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:196: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 196) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 26 warnings. The macro-in-comments are from commenting out lines from the original Fedora spec. The rest are from the original. binary rpms: openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.1e-4 ['1:1.0.1e-4.fc18', '1:1.0.1e-4'] openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/openssl openssl-freeworld.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/pki/CA/private 0700L openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/openssl-freeworld-1.0.1e/CHANGES openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/tls/certs/Makefile openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: install-file-in-docs /usr/share/doc/openssl-freeworld-1.0.1e/INSTALL openssl-freeworld-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided openssl openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libgost.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libpadlock.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libubsec.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libchil.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libcapi.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libgmp.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libaep.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libsureware.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/libssl.so.1.0.1e openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/lib4758cca.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libcswift.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libatalla.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libnuron.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/libcrypto.so.1.0.1e openssl-freeworld-perl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary c_rehash openssl-freeworld-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 26 warnings. This is all from the original. I don't know why the binaries aren't getting stripped. I might try to clean some of this up, even if it means more changes from the Fedora spec. This is my first RPM Fusion package, and I'm seeking a sponsor. I'm not a Fedora sponsored packager either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 months, 1 week

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 2151] New: Review request: perle-serial-kmod - Perle Serial PCI card kernel module(s)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2151 Bug #: 2151 Summary: Review request: perle-serial-kmod - Perle Serial PCI card kernel module(s) Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: philipp(a)redfish-solutions.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Perle Systems makes several PCI and PCIe serial cards, but there support for linux 2.6 and 3.x is lacking. This package patches their driver tarball and builds it as per rpmfusion as kmod. ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/pub/perle-serial-kmod.spec ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/pub/perle-serial-kmod-3.8.0-6.1.fc16.1.sr... == description == This package provides a driver for the family of Perle serial cards. The cards supported are: Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, 8i, and 16 cards Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, 8i, and 16 SI cards Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, and 8i Express cards Perle PCI-RAS V.92 (4 and 8 port) cards Perle Speed1, 2, 4, and 8 LE cards Read /usr/share/doc/perle-serial/README for more info. ==== This is a kmod package, and as such can't be included in Fedora. ==== $ rpmlint perle-serial-kmod.spec perle-serial-kmod.spec:44: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 44, tab: line 6) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ The spaces come as a result of cut&paste of taking the description directly from upstream files. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/*perle-serial* kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C perle-serial kernel module(s) for 3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64 kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64/extra/perle-serial/perle-serial.ko kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-perle-serial.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage kmod-perle-serial.x86_64: W: no-documentation perle-serial-kmod-common.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) userland -> user land, user-land, slanderous perle-serial-kmod-common.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Userland -> User land, User-land, Slanderous perle-serial-kmod-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/perle-serial-kmod-3.8.0/_kmod_build_3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64/perle-serial.c 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings. $ "Userland" and "Metapackage" are legitimate words in this lexicon. The wrong FSF address in perle-serial.c is directly from the upstream sources. Kernel modules are unstripped (or they wouldn't load otherwise). The not capitalized warning applies to a string that's generated from a macro. The documentation is in the -common package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 7 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2221] New: Review request: libarea - Library that allows for creating tool paths for pocketing

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2221 Bug #: 2221 Summary: Review request: libarea - Library that allows for creating tool paths for pocketing Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: SpikeFedora(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libarea/libarea.spec SRPM URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libarea/libarea-0.0.2-0.1.20111215git599996... Description: LibAREA is a library that allows for creating tool paths for pocketing. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: "Some software is not functional or useful without the presence of external code dependencies in the runtime operating system environment. When those external code dependencies are non-free, legally unacceptable, or binary-only [...], then the dependent software is not acceptable for inclusion in Fedora"[1] Since atm only HeeksCNC uses this lib and HeeksCNC depends on OCE (HeeksCNC->HeeksCAD-devel->OCE-devel), which is considered non-free, I assume the term "not useful" applies here. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines rpmlint output: SPECS/libarea.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libarea-svnHEAD.tar.bz2 libarea.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libarea-svnHEAD.tar.bz2 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Upstream doesn't provide a release package tarball. Careful: I usually don't do any python packaging. Here be dragons! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 7 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 2599] New: Review request: libshout-idjc - Icecast source streaming library modified for IDJC

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2599 Bug #: 2599 Summary: Review request: libshout-idjc - Icecast source streaming library modified for IDJC Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: comzeradd(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 SPEC: http://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/libshout-idjc.spec SRPM: http://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/libshout-idjc-2.3.0-1.fc17.src.rpm The libshout is a library for communicating with and sending data to an icecast server. It handles the socket connection, the timing of the data, and prevents most bad data from getting to the icecast server. libshout-idjc is a modified version of libshout library with extra functionality needed by idjc. This is package can not be include in Fedora main repos because it contains code for supporting non-free codecs (eg. AAC). $ rpmlint libshout-idjc-2.3.0-1.fc17.src.rpm libshout-idjc.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Icecast -> Ice cast, Ice-cast, Icecap libshout-idjc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US icecast -> ice cast, ice-cast, icecap $ rpmlint libshout-idjc-2.3.0-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm libshout-idjc.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Icecast -> Ice cast, Ice-cast, Icecap libshout-idjc.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US icecast -> ice cast, ice-cast, icecap 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. This is my first RPM Fusion package, but I am a Fedora Packager. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/comzeradd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 7 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2600] New: Review request: idjc - DJ application for streaming audio

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2600 Bug #: 2600 Summary: Review request: idjc - DJ application for streaming audio Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: comzeradd(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 SPEC: http://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/idjc.spec SRPM: http://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/idjc-0.8.8-1.fc17.src.rpm Internet DJ Console is a client for streaming live radio shows over the Internet using Icecast or Shoutcast servers. It has a two panel playlist mode, with automatic cross-fading. It uses jack as a back-end and it supports all major free audio codecs. Package is not eligible to be included in Fedora main repos because it depends on other RPMFusion packages (eg. lame, ffmpeg). $ rpmlint idjc-0.8.8-1.fc17.src.rpm idjc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US playlist -> play list, play-list, pluralist idjc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codecs -> codes, coders, code's 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint idjc-0.8.8-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm idjc.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US playlist -> play list, play-list, pluralist idjc.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codecs -> codes, coders, code's 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. This is my first RPMFusion package along with #2599 But I am a Fedora Packager https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/comzeradd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 7 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 2632] New: Review request: amuleadunanza - File sharing client compatible with eDonkey - Adunanza MOD

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2632 Bug #: 2632 Summary: Review request: amuleadunanza - File sharing client compatible with eDonkey - Adunanza MOD Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: lorenzo.dalrio(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec: http://lorenzodalrio.fedorapeople.org/amuleadunanza.spec srpm: http://lorenzodalrio.fedorapeople.org/amuleadunanza-2012.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: aMuleAdunanzA is the mod of aMule dedicated to Fastweb ISP users. aMule is an easy to use multi-platform client for ED2K Peer-to-Peer Network. It is a fork of xMule, which was based on eMule for Windows. aMule currently supports (but is not limited to) the following platforms: Linux, *BSD and MacOS X. Why not in fedora: could be legal problems with p2p software. rpmlint output: >Checking: amuleadunanza-2012.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm > amuleadunanza-2012.1-1.fc17.src.rpm > amuleadunanza-debuginfo-2012.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm > amuleadunanza-nogui-2012.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm >amuleadunanza.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) eDonkey -> e Donkey, >donkey, monkey >amuleadunanza.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US aMule -> a Mule, >mule, amulet >amuleadunanza.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, >mufti >amuleadunanza.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xMule -> x Mule, >mule, mullet >amuleadunanza.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whis -> which, >his, whirs >amuleadunanza.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eMule -> e Mule, >mule, Lemuel >amuleadunanza.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/amulegui.1.gz >4: warning: macro `"' not defined This one is not clear to me, man page seems to work fine. >amuleadunanza.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) eDonkey -> e Donkey, >donkey, monkey >amuleadunanza.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US aMule -> a Mule, >mule, amulet >amuleadunanza.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, >mufti >amuleadunanza.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xMule -> x Mule, >mule, mullet >amuleadunanza.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whis -> which, his, >whirs >amuleadunanza.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eMule -> e Mule, >mule, Lemuel >amuleadunanza-nogui.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib This one refers to systemd unit used to start amuleadunanza daemon. >4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings. Noticed in rpmfusion wishlist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 7 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2682] New: Review request: higan - A Nintendo multi-system emulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2682 Bug #: 2682 Summary: Review request: higan - A Nintendo multi-system emulator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: belegdol(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org higan is a multi-system emulator that began development on 2004-10-14. It currently supports the following systems: * Nintendo * Super Nintendo * Game Boy * Game Boy Color * Game Boy Advance * Nintendo DS higan also supports the following subsystems: * Super Game Boy * BS-X Satellaview * Sufami Turbo higan focuses on accuracy and clean code above all else. It never uses speed or compatibility hacks. As a result, the minimum system requirements are greater than with other emulators. It was formerly known as bsnes. SRPM URL: http://lesloueizeh.com/belegdol/higan-0.092-2.fc19.src.rpm Spec URL: http://lesloueizeh.com/belegdol/higan.spec Why not in Fedora: it requires copyrighted ROMs to do anything useful rpmlint output: higan.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti higan.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US compatibilty -> compatibility, compatibly, comparability higan.src: W: strange-permission higan-source-cleanup.sh 0755L higan.src: W: invalid-url Source0: higan_v092-source-noroms.tar.xz higan.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti higan.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US compatibilty -> compatibility, compatibly, comparability higan.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided bsnes-pixelshaders higan.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided bsnes-snesfilter higan.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided bsnes-snesreader higan.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided bsnes-supergameboy higan.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libananke.so higan.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary higan higan.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: higan_v092-source-noroms.tar.xz 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 12 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 7 months

1
21
0 / 0

[Bug 2696] New: ogmrip-profiles - Collection of profiles for OGMRip

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2696 Bug #: 2696 Summary: ogmrip-profiles - Collection of profiles for OGMRip Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: giallu(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org This is a very simple package containing few XML files with ogmrip profiles. http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/ogmrip-profiles.spec http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/ogmrip-profiles-0.3-1.fc18.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 7 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 2909] New: gtkradiant - Level design program for video games

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2909 Bug #: 2909 Summary: gtkradiant - Level design program for video games Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: bebo.sudo(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec: http://sourceforge.net/projects/bebosudo-rpms/files/gtkradiant/F18/SRPM/g... SRPM: http://sourceforge.net/projects/bebosudo-rpms/files/gtkradiant/F18/SRPM/g... Description: GtkRadiant is a powerful level editor used for various ego-shooter games. It stores level data in text format and uses compilers (q3map2 for QuakeIII, for instance) to create the binary map files. For more detailed information see: http://icculus.org/gtkradiant/ ----------- I've yet tried to submit gtkradiant to the redhat bugzilla, but it needs proprietary SDK to works, so I've to submit to rpmfusion. Here is the old bug in the rh bugzilla (now closed): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836840 I've followed all Hans' tips and I re-packaged the rpm with the last sources available. Here is the result from rpmlint on the spec and on all the rpms: $ rpmlint -i gtkradiant.spec ../SRPMS/gtkradiant-1.6.3-9.20130803git.fc18.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/gtkradiant-{1.6.3-9.20130803git.fc18.x86_64.rpm,debuginfo-1.6.3-9.20130803git.fc18.x86_64.rpm} ../RPMS/noarch/gtkradiant-data-1.6.3-9.20130803git.fc18.noarch.rpm gtkradiant.spec: W: invalid-url Source4: gtkradiant-1.6-gamepacks-20130805.tar.gz The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. gtkradiant.src: W: invalid-url Source4: gtkradiant-1.6-gamepacks-20130805.tar.gz The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. gtkradiant.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. gtkradiant.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib64/gtkradiant/installs /usr/share/gtkradiant/gamepacks The target of the symbolic link does not exist within this package or its file based dependencies. Verify spelling of the link target and that the target is included in a package in this package's dependency chain. gtkradiant.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary q3map2 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. gtkradiant.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary q3map2_urt Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. gtkradiant.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gtkradiant Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. gtkradiant.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/gtkradiant.desktop gtkradiant the .desktop file is for a file not present in the package. You should check the requires or see if this is not a error gtkradiant-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources This debuginfo package appears to contain debug symbols but no source files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, or being compiled without compiler debug flags (which again often is a sign of distro's default compiler flags ignored which might have security consequences), or other compiler flags which result in rpmbuild's debuginfo extraction not working as expected. Verify that the binaries are not unexpectedly stripped and that the intended compiler flags are used. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 8 warnings. $ The first two warnings I think could be ignored because the source is created manually, because the upstream doesn't provide a package for the SDKs. All the docs are in the gtkradiant-data package, so I don't know if I have to put some docs manually to solve the third warning. in the fourth warning, rpmlint complains about a "dangling-symlink", but I think it shouldn't do it, because it refer at the gamepacks present in the data package and, as said by rpmlint itself, its a chain of packages. the other three warnings regard the lack of documentation to the three execs, but I don't know where to find it. the "desktopfile-without-binary" warning is a strange error, because the gtkradiant exec exist, and I don't know how to solve it. And finally, the error at the end I really don't know what it means and how to solve it. But the biggest problem is that package can't work because gtkradiant try to write in the folder where it is present the exec. I have already reported it to the developers but nobody helped me. here is the link at the discussion on the ML: http://icculus.org/pipermail/gtkradiant/2013-February/011841.html Any sort of help is appreciated :) Thanks for your time, have a nice day! Alberto -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 7 months

1
17
0 / 0

[Bug 2997] New: Review Request: spinroot - Formal verification of multi-threaded software applications

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2997 Bug #: 2997 Summary: Review Request: spinroot - Formal verification of multi-threaded software applications Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: alexisis-pristontale(a)hotmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 SPEC: http://lameire.iiens.net/spinroot/spinroot.spec SRPM: http://lameire.iiens.net/spinroot/spinroot-6.2.5-1.fc18.src.rpm MOCK BUILD LOG: http://lameire.iiens.net/spinroot/build.log ALL OTHER USEFULL STUFF: http://lameire.iiens.net/spinroot/ RPMLINT: spinroot.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multi -> mulch, mufti spinroot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti spinroot.x86_64: W: invalid-license free use for educational purpose Not eligible on fedora repo : non free app, only redistribuable without money exchange. NB: a "spin" package is already avalable on fedora repo, I rename the package folowing the website domain Description: Spin targets the efficient verification of multi-threaded software, not the verification of hardware circuits. The tool supports a high level language to specify systems descriptions called PROMELA (short for: PROcess MEta LAnguage). Spin has been used to trace logical design errors in distributed systems design, such as operating systems, data communications protocols, switching systems, concurrent algorithms, railway signaling protocols, control software for spacecraft, nuclear power plants, etc. The tool checks the logical consistency of a specification and reports on deadlocks, race conditions, different types of incompleteness, and unwarranted assumptions about the relative speeds of processes. I have no approuved package on rpm-fusion, but I'm already approuved on fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 7 months

1
7
0 / 0

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers January 2016