[Bug 4041] New: Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041
Bug #: 4041
Summary: Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mark.harfouche(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
This is a repackaged version of what is available
on the Mendeley website and attempts to make use
of system libraries instead of the ones packaged
with Mendeley.
srpm:
http://markharfouche.com/~makerpm/mendeleydesktop-1.16.1-2.fc23.src.rpm
Source rpmlint:
$ rpmlint /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mendeleydesktop-1.16.1-2.fc23.src.rpm
mendeleydesktop.src: W: invalid-license Proprietary
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Binary rpmlint:
$ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-23-x86_64/result/mendeleydesktop-1.16.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm
mendeleydesktop.x86_64: W: invalid-license Proprietary
mendeleydesktop.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libPDFNetC.so
libPDFNetC.so
mendeleydesktop.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libPDFNetC.so
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
mendeleydesktop.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libMendeley.so.1.16.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
mendeleydesktop.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mendeleydesktop
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.
Justification for errors:
W: invalid-license: Proprietary license is why I need RPMFusion
E: invalid-soname can't change that. The source is a binary.
W: shared-lib-calls-exit: I don't know what this means. I don't think I can
change it
W: no-manual-page-for-binary: I don't think this is necessary. Also, this was a
binary software.
$ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-23-x86_64/result/mendeleydesktop-devel-1.16.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm
mendeleydesktop-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Proprietary
mendeleydesktop-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
mendeleydesktop-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib <- I don't know what this means
W: no-documentation <- this is a devel package
My first RPMFusion package. I am seeking a sponsor.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 week, 2 days
[Bug 3576] New: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
Bug #: 3576
Summary: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software
Studio
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2, 30
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio.spec
Open Broadcaster Software is free and open source software for video recording
and live streaming.
OBS is not in Fedora because it depends on ffmpeg and other non free software.
I need to be sponsored as this is my first package and I'm not sponsored in
Fedora.
OBS studio has some issues with placing files in correct location, there was a
discussion about this (https://github.com/jp9000/obs-studio/pull/391). I think
that all of these errors are related to this.
rpmlint outputs:
$ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
obs-studio.src:33: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so*
obs-studio.src:54: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs
obs-studio.src:62: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobsglad.so
obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobs.so
obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libobs-opengl.so
obs-studio.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/obs-studio/COPYING
obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
3 months
[Bug 3954] New: Review request: nordlicht - Create colorful barcodes from video files
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3954
Bug #: 3954
Summary: Review request: nordlicht - Create colorful barcodes
from video files
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: ngompa13(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/nordlicht.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description:
nordlicht is for converting video files into colorful barcodes. It is inspired
by the Moviebarcode Tumblr, but aims at the next logical step: Integrating
these barcodes into video players to make navigation faster and more precise.
Why nordlicht isn't eligible to be included in Fedora:
nordlicht depends on FFmpeg, which is not included in Fedora, but is included
in RPM Fusion.
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint nordlicht.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.src.rpm
nordlicht.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) barcodes -> bar codes,
bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
nordlicht.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar codes,
bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
nordlicht.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) barcodes -> bar codes,
bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
nordlicht.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar
codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-libs-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
nordlicht-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar
codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-devel-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
nordlicht-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib [Ignored because
pkgconfig file and symlink .so belong in devel]
nordlicht-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation [Ignored because documentation is
included in the libs package, which is Required by the devel package]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
This is my first RPM Fusion package, but I've been a packager in Fedora for
several years (FAS: ngompa).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 months, 4 weeks
[Bug 3430] New: Review request: qtads - Multimedia interpreter for Tads games
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3430
Bug #: 3430
Summary: Review request: qtads - Multimedia interpreter for
Tads games
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: valtri(a)civ.zcu.cz
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/qtads-2.1.6-1/qtads.spec
SRPM URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/qtads-2.1.6-1/qtads-2.1.6-1.fc22.src.rpm
Description: QTads is a cross-platform, multimedia interpreter for Tads games,
compatible with HTML TADS. Both Tads versions in use today (Tads 2 and Tads 3)
are supported.
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: non-commercial
license of the bundled parts (tads2, tads3, htmltads)
Rpmlint:
qtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(md5-deutsch-c++)
qtads.src:26: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(sha2-gladman)
qtads.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qtads/qtads-2.1.6.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not
Found
qtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/qtads/COPYING
qtads.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/qtads/HTML_TADS_LICENSE
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssoundogg.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadssound.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysframe.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/dispwidget.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/settings.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswingroup.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/confdialog.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysimagejpeg.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/hos_qt.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadstimer.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysframe.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssoundwav.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/settings.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswinaboutbox.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadsimage.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswinaboutbox.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysfont.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssoundmpeg.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/main.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/dispwidget.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/hos_qt.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadshostifc.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/dispwidgetinput.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswin.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/dispwidgetinput.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadssound.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/missing.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysimagemng.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysimage.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssound.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssoundmidi.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswingroup.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysimagepng.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/confdialog.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/missing.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswin.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswininput.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/oemqt.c
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/osqt.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadsimage.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/osqt.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswininput.h
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 44 errors, 9 warnings.
invalid-license: non-free licenses are not known to rpmlint
unversioned-explicit-provides: these bundled pieces has no version (it is also
in other packages)
incorrect-fsf-address: reported here: https://github.com/realnc/qtads/pull/3
invalid-url: temporary outtage I guess? we can change it to github (where the
tarbal is generated though)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9 months
[Bug 3111] New: Review Request: ppsspp - playstation portable emulator
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111
Bug #: 3111
Summary: Review Request: ppsspp - playstation portable emulator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: fast.rizwaan(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Description:
PPSSPP is a playstation portable emulator
Why not in fedora: emulators are not allowed.
SPEC:https://www.dropbox.com/s/likw80h5k1yqigp/ppsspp.spec
SRPM:https://www.dropbox.com/s/mmaz75mm4hauacf/ppsspp-v0.9.6_366-1.gitga1...
also I've made a bash script which makes latest rpm from git snapshot
rpms:https://www.dropbox.com/s/5ziwo5e49emml6j/make-ppsspp-rpm-from-git.sh
rpmlint output:
bash-4.2$ rpmlint ppsspp.spec ppsspp-v0.9.6_366-1.gitga113abd.fc20.src.rpm
ppsspp.spec:10: W: non-standard-group Applications/Games
ppsspp.spec:14: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
ppsspp.spec:14: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.spec:15: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.spec:17: W: macro-in-comment %{chkoutversion}
ppsspp.spec:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.spec:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.spec:55: W: setup-not-quiet
ppsspp.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: ppsspp-v0.9.6_366.tar.xz
ppsspp.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Playstation -> PlayStation, Play
station, Play-station
ppsspp.src: W: non-standard-group Applications/Games
ppsspp.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
ppsspp.src: W: invalid-url URL ppsspp.org
ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission make-ppsspp-from-git.sh 0755L
ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission ppsspp.spec 0640L
ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission ppsspp.png 0755L
ppsspp.src:14: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
ppsspp.src:14: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.src:15: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.src:17: W: macro-in-comment %{chkoutversion}
ppsspp.src:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.src:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.src:55: W: setup-not-quiet
ppsspp.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ppsspp-v0.9.6_366.tar.xz
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 24 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9 months, 1 week
[Bug 3036] New: Review request: RBDoom3BFG - Robert Beckebans' Doom 3 BFG engine
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3036
Bug #: 3036
Summary: Review request: RBDoom3BFG - Robert Beckebans' Doom 3
BFG engine
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: negativo17(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
SPEC: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/RBDoom3BFG.spec
SRPM:
http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/RBDoom3BFG-1.1400-11.gitaaed5dd0.fc19.sr...
RBDoom3BFG 3 is a Doom 3 BFG GPL source modification. The goal of RBDoom3BFG 3
is to bring Doom 3 BFG with the help of SDL to all suitable platforms. Bugs
present in the original DOOM 3 will be fixed (when identified) without altering
the original game-play.
Why it's not in Fedora?
Packaging guidelines prohibit engines where the content is not available. The
engine is fully Open Source.
Note:
Information on the package and on the game content is inside the README.txt
file.
$ rpmlint RBDoom3BFG*rpm
RBDoom3BFG.src: W: strange-permission RBDoom3BFG-git-checkout.sh 0751L
RBDoom3BFG.src: W: invalid-url Source0: RBDoom3BFG-1.1400-gitaaed5dd0.tar.bz2
RBDoom3BFG.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libidlib.so libidlib.so
RBDoom3BFG.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/RBDoom3BFG-1.1400/COPYING.txt
RBDoom3BFG.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary RBDoom3BFG
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.
> RBDoom3BFG.src: W: strange-permission RBDoom3BFG-git-checkout.sh 0751L
> RBDoom3BFG.src: W: invalid-url Source0: RBDoom3BFG-1.1400-gitaaed5dd0.tar.bz2
Script used to generate the Source0 main file. This is legitimate in Fedora
packaging guidelines.
> RBDoom3BFG.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libidlib.so libidlib.so
This is the main engine code, it is dynamically loaded at runtime from the
ld.so path; default compilation from upstream sources loads it through RPATH.
The game it's looking for that specific name, much like a plugin. There's no
need to run ldconfig in %post/%postun.
The rest can be ignored.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 year, 2 months
[Bug 3900] New: Review Request: tivolibre - Java app and library for decoding TiVo files to standard MPEG files
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3900
Bug #: 3900
Summary: Review Request: tivolibre - Java app and library for
decoding TiVo files to standard MPEG files
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: orion(a)cora.nwra.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Java app and library for decoding TiVo files to standard MPEG files.
Spec file: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/rpmfusion/tivolibre.spec
SRPM file:
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/rpmfusion/tivolibre-0.7.2-1.fc23.src.rpm
This contains an implementation of the Qualcomm Touring family of encryption
algorithms and has the following restriction:
# 5. The Turing family of encryption algorithms are covered by patents in
# the United States of America and other countries. A free and
# irrevocable license is hereby granted for the use of such patents to
# the extent required to utilize the Turing family of encryption
# algorithms for any purpose, subject to the condition that any
# commercial product utilising any of the Turing family of encryption
# algorithms should show the words "Encryption by QUALCOMM" either on the
# product or in the associated documentation.
and hence should be considered nonfree.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 year, 2 months
[Bug 2997] New: Review Request: spinroot - Formal verification of multi-threaded software applications
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2997
Bug #: 2997
Summary: Review Request: spinroot - Formal verification of
multi-threaded software applications
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: alexisis-pristontale(a)hotmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
SPEC: http://lameire.iiens.net/spinroot/spinroot.spec
SRPM: http://lameire.iiens.net/spinroot/spinroot-6.2.5-1.fc18.src.rpm
MOCK BUILD LOG: http://lameire.iiens.net/spinroot/build.log
ALL OTHER USEFULL STUFF: http://lameire.iiens.net/spinroot/
RPMLINT:
spinroot.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multi -> mulch, mufti
spinroot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti
spinroot.x86_64: W: invalid-license free use for educational purpose
Not eligible on fedora repo : non free app, only redistribuable without money
exchange.
NB: a "spin" package is already avalable on fedora repo, I rename the package
folowing the website domain
Description:
Spin targets the efficient verification of multi-threaded software, not the
verification of hardware circuits. The tool supports a high level language to
specify systems descriptions called PROMELA (short for: PROcess MEta LAnguage).
Spin has been used to trace logical design errors in distributed systems
design,
such as operating systems, data communications protocols, switching systems,
concurrent algorithms, railway signaling protocols, control software for
spacecraft, nuclear power plants, etc. The tool checks the logical consistency
of a specification and reports on deadlocks, race conditions, different types
of
incompleteness, and unwarranted assumptions about the relative speeds of
processes.
I have no approuved package on rpm-fusion, but I'm already approuved on fedora.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 year, 2 months
[Bug 4059] New: Review request: dwarftherapist - Management tool designed to run side-by-side with Dwarf Fortress
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4059
Bug #: 4059
Summary: Review request: dwarftherapist - Management tool
designed to run side-by-side with Dwarf Fortress
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: rosser.bjr(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/rpmfusion/dwarftherapis...
SRPM URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/23/SRPMs/dwarftherapist...
Description:
Management tool designed to run side-by-side with Dwarf Fortress.
Offers several views and interface improvements to Dwarf Fortress.
Some features include:
Persistent custom professions - import and manage any number of custom
professions across all your forts.
Assign multiple dwarves to a custom profession at once to unify active labors
Manage labors and professions much more easily than in-game using a flexible
UI, allowing quick review of all dwarves at-a-glance
Display all pending changes before they're written to the game
Sort labor columns by associated skill level
Persistent and customizable display; change colors, reposition/hide
information screens
Group your dwarves by several criteria
This is a heavily modified version of the original Dwarf Therapist that
is still maintained for new versions of Dwarf Fortress.
rpmlint output:
dwarftherapist.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dwarves ->
wharves
dwarftherapist.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customizable ->
customization
dwarftherapist.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reposition ->
preposition, deposition, re position
dwarftherapist.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dwarftherapist
dwarftherapist.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary DwarfTherapist
dwarftherapist.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dwarves -> wharves
dwarftherapist.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customizable ->
customization
dwarftherapist.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reposition ->
preposition, deposition, re position
dwarftherapist.src:62: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %qmake_qt5
PREFIX=%{buildroot}%{_prefix}
The only questionable thing here is the rpm-buildroot-usage warning, and (for
the moment) I'm ignoring that because there doesn't seem to be another way to
change where the buildsystem installs (the DESTDIR option seems to be entirely
ignored by "make install").
Why not in Fedora:
dwarftherapist requires an installation of Dwarf Fortress on the system to be
useful. I've added a Requires: dwarffortress(x86-32), meaning that this package
would need to be in -nonfree. (The architecture dependency is needed because,
at the moment, DF is only built for 32-bit systems, although that may be
changing in the near future).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 year, 3 months