August 2017 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2929] New: Review Request: smtube - A Youtube browser that can play and download Youtube videos

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2929 Bug #: 2929 Summary: Review Request: smtube - A Youtube browser that can play and download Youtube videos Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: cickumqt(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://cicku.me/smtube.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/smtube-1.8-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: SMTube is a Youtube browser which allows to search, play and download Youtube videos. This project is based on some code from UMPlayer. Reason for not in Fedora: It needs smplayer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 months, 1 week

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 4041] New: Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Bug #: 4041 Summary: Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mark.harfouche(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org This is a repackaged version of what is available on the Mendeley website and attempts to make use of system libraries instead of the ones packaged with Mendeley. srpm: http://markharfouche.com/~makerpm/mendeleydesktop-1.16.1-2.fc23.src.rpm Source rpmlint: $ rpmlint /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mendeleydesktop-1.16.1-2.fc23.src.rpm mendeleydesktop.src: W: invalid-license Proprietary 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Binary rpmlint: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-23-x86_64/result/mendeleydesktop-1.16.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm mendeleydesktop.x86_64: W: invalid-license Proprietary mendeleydesktop.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libPDFNetC.so libPDFNetC.so mendeleydesktop.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libPDFNetC.so exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 mendeleydesktop.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libMendeley.so.1.16.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 mendeleydesktop.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mendeleydesktop 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. Justification for errors: W: invalid-license: Proprietary license is why I need RPMFusion E: invalid-soname can't change that. The source is a binary. W: shared-lib-calls-exit: I don't know what this means. I don't think I can change it W: no-manual-page-for-binary: I don't think this is necessary. Also, this was a binary software. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-23-x86_64/result/mendeleydesktop-devel-1.16.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm mendeleydesktop-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Proprietary mendeleydesktop-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib mendeleydesktop-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib <- I don't know what this means W: no-documentation <- this is a devel package My first RPMFusion package. I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

9 months, 4 weeks

1
58
0 / 0

[Bug 3576] New: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 Bug #: 3576 Summary: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio.spec Open Broadcaster Software is free and open source software for video recording and live streaming. OBS is not in Fedora because it depends on ffmpeg and other non free software. I need to be sponsored as this is my first package and I'm not sponsored in Fedora. OBS studio has some issues with placing files in correct location, there was a discussion about this (https://github.com/jp9000/obs-studio/pull/391). I think that all of these errors are related to this. rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm obs-studio.src:33: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:54: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:62: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobsglad.so obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobs.so obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobs-opengl.so obs-studio.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/obs-studio/COPYING obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year

1
51
0 / 0

[Bug 4363] New: Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363 Bug ID: 4363 Summary: Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: alexjnewt(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC URL: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/chromium-libs-media-freeworl... SRPM URL: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/chromium-libs-media-freeworl... Description: Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs. Chromium is an open-source web browser, powered by WebKit (Blink). This package replaces the default chromium-libs-media package, which is limited in what it can include. RPMlint output: chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codecs -> codes, coders, code's chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codecs -> codes, coders, code's chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:227: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libc.so chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:879: W: macro-in-comment %{target} chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:90: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 90, tab: line 60) chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: invalid-url Source2: depot_tools.git-master.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. None of this really matters too much. As for the hardcoded-library-path error, please read the note in the spec for more details. The mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs is trivial and will be fixed in the next revision. This package is mostly based off of the chromium package but has been trimmed down to only really include the two codec libraries that Fedora will not provide for legal reasons. I'm sure I'm probably building too much and things can be trimmed down. Note that this package takes forever to compile, but as I said, the spec likely needs to be cleaned up, but feedback is welcome for sure. This will likely go into rpmfusion free, but I'll be honest, I need to look into the source a bit more as there maybe some nonfree bits. I'll continue to work on it, I just wanted to upload something that built, so I can get feedback. One issue that should be addressed though; chromium depends on chromium-libs-media, which this package provides as an alternative to the trimmed down fedora version. I would think if chromium updates without this packaging being updated, this package would be removed by the updater, while if this package updates before chromium, it would cause broken dependencies. EItherway, having rpmfusion's packages out of sync with Fedora's would no so nice. Perhaps a "chromium-freeworld" package would be better? The maintainer for chromium has made it painfully easy to package a freeworld version, so this wouldn't be too bad. I'll run a build of a chromium-freeworld package overnight for testing, as I'm sort of leaning towards this being a better option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 4 months

1
68
0 / 0

[Bug 3954] New: Review request: nordlicht - Create colorful barcodes from video files

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3954 Bug #: 3954 Summary: Review request: nordlicht - Create colorful barcodes from video files Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: ngompa13(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/nordlicht.spec SRPM URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: nordlicht is for converting video files into colorful barcodes. It is inspired by the Moviebarcode Tumblr, but aims at the next logical step: Integrating these barcodes into video players to make navigation faster and more precise. Why nordlicht isn't eligible to be included in Fedora: nordlicht depends on FFmpeg, which is not included in Fedora, but is included in RPM Fusion. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint nordlicht.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.src.rpm nordlicht.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) barcodes -> bar codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly] nordlicht.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm nordlicht.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) barcodes -> bar codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly] nordlicht.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint nordlicht-libs-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm nordlicht-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint nordlicht-devel-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm nordlicht-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib [Ignored because pkgconfig file and symlink .so belong in devel] nordlicht-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation [Ignored because documentation is included in the libs package, which is Required by the devel package] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. This is my first RPM Fusion package, but I've been a packager in Fedora for several years (FAS: ngompa). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 5 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 4186] New: scid - A chess database application

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4186 Bug #: 4186 Summary: scid - A chess database application Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: sergio(a)serjux.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC: http://www.serjux.com/rpms/scid.spec SRPM: http://www.serjux.com/rpms/scid-4.6.2-1.fc21.src.rpm I will be able to add this package , the scid.spec is the same made by Mikhail Kalenkov , I just update it to 4.6.2 Scid can perform many different searches, such as for particular players, a certain opening position, material searches, and pattern searches such as isolated pawns. It is very fast, because it uses its own efficient format, but it can convert games to and from PGN, the standard format for chess game files. Scid can use a chess engine such as Crafty to analyze games and also has a "tree" mode where it automatically shows all moves played from the current position, their opening codes, success rates, etc. Why not in Fedora: Scid package has some small part of nonfree code. It is Nalimov tablebase decoding code. Nalimov tablebases may be very important in the endgame analysis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 5 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 4640] New: Review request: slowmoVideo - Creates slow-motion videos from your footage

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4640 Bug ID: 4640 Summary: Review request: slowmoVideo - Creates slow-motion videos from your footage Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: metal3d(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 namespace: free Spec file: https://examples.metal3d.org/slowmoVideo/slowmoVideo.spec SRPM file: https://examples.metal3d.org/slowmoVideo/slowmoVideo-git33f5c84-1.fc26.sr... It does not simply make your videos play at 0.01× speed. You can smoothly slow down and speed up your footage, optionally with motion blur. How does slow motion work? slowmoVideo tries to find out where pixels move in the video (this information is called Optical Flow), and then uses this information to calculate the additional frames between the ones recorded by your camera. This package could not be elligible on Fedora official repository due the ffmpeg dependencies. That is my first rpm on rpmfusion and I'm seeking a sponsor. Regards, Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 5 months

1
25
0 / 0

[Bug 3430] New: Review request: qtads - Multimedia interpreter for Tads games

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3430 Bug #: 3430 Summary: Review request: qtads - Multimedia interpreter for Tads games Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: valtri(a)civ.zcu.cz CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/qtads-2.1.6-1/qtads.spec SRPM URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/qtads-2.1.6-1/qtads-2.1.6-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: QTads is a cross-platform, multimedia interpreter for Tads games, compatible with HTML TADS. Both Tads versions in use today (Tads 2 and Tads 3) are supported. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: non-commercial license of the bundled parts (tads2, tads3, htmltads) Rpmlint: qtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial qtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial qtads.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(md5-deutsch-c++) qtads.src:26: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(sha2-gladman) qtads.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qtads/qtads-2.1.6.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not Found qtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial qtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial qtads.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/qtads/COPYING qtads.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/qtads/HTML_TADS_LICENSE qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssoundogg.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadssound.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysframe.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/dispwidget.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/settings.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswingroup.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/confdialog.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysimagejpeg.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/hos_qt.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadstimer.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysframe.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssoundwav.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/settings.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswinaboutbox.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadsimage.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswinaboutbox.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysfont.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssoundmpeg.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/main.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/dispwidget.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/hos_qt.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadshostifc.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/dispwidgetinput.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswin.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/dispwidgetinput.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadssound.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/missing.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysimagemng.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysimage.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssound.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssoundmidi.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswingroup.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysimagepng.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/confdialog.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/missing.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswin.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswininput.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/oemqt.c qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/osqt.cc qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadsimage.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/osqt.h qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswininput.h 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 44 errors, 9 warnings. invalid-license: non-free licenses are not known to rpmlint unversioned-explicit-provides: these bundled pieces has no version (it is also in other packages) incorrect-fsf-address: reported here: https://github.com/realnc/qtads/pull/3 invalid-url: temporary outtage I guess? we can change it to github (where the tarbal is generated though) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 6 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 4444] New: firebird-emu - Third-party emulator for ARM-based TI calculators

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4444 Bug ID: 4444 Summary: firebird-emu - Third-party emulator for ARM-based TI calculators Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: rosser.bjr(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Source URL: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/rpmfusion/firebird/firebird-emu.spec SRPM URL: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/rpmfusion/firebird/firebird-emu-1.2-1... Description: This project is the community, third-party TI Nspire emulator, Texas Instruments' ARM-based series of graphing calculators. It supports the emulation of Touchpad, CX and CX CAS calcs on Android, iOS, Linux, Mac and Windows. FAS Username: tc01 Why not in Fedora: firebird-emu is pure FOSS, but not only does it require TI's proprietary operating system for the Nspire line of calculators, but also the proprietary boot/base code blobs from the calculator itself. Thus as per the emulator policy, since this package isn't functional without any proprietary blobs, I believe this package still needs to be in RPM Fusion. rpmlint output: firebird-emu.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US calcs -> calls, calms, calks firebird-emu.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iOS -> OS, SOS, DOS firebird-emu.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US calcs -> calls, calms, calks firebird-emu.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iOS -> OS, SOS, DOS firebird-emu.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary firebird firebird-emu.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary firebird-send Note: upstream usually uses the name "firebird" for this package, but the name "firebird" belongs to another package in Fedora, so I opted for "firebird-emu" (as this name is also sometimes used by upstream). There is a potential for name conflicts. Currently the firebird package installs a %{_sbindir}/firebird [1]. This package installs a %{_bindir}/firebird. This doesn't cause a conflict per _se_, but if both are on $PATH there's a potential for confusion. Should I rename the binary from firebird -> firebird-emu as well? As far as I can tell, the packages do not currently conflict in any other way. The current firebird-emu filelist is: -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/firebird -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/firebird-send -rwxr-xr-x /usr/share/applications/firebird.desktop drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/firebird-emu -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firebird-emu/README.md -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firebird-emu/TODO.md -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/icons/firebird.png drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/licenses/firebird-emu -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/licenses/firebird-emu/LICENSE [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/firebird.git/tree/firebird.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 6 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 3111] New: Review Request: ppsspp - playstation portable emulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111 Bug #: 3111 Summary: Review Request: ppsspp - playstation portable emulator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: fast.rizwaan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Description: PPSSPP is a playstation portable emulator Why not in fedora: emulators are not allowed. SPEC:https://www.dropbox.com/s/likw80h5k1yqigp/ppsspp.spec SRPM:https://www.dropbox.com/s/mmaz75mm4hauacf/ppsspp-v0.9.6_366-1.gitga1... also I've made a bash script which makes latest rpm from git snapshot rpms:https://www.dropbox.com/s/5ziwo5e49emml6j/make-ppsspp-rpm-from-git.sh rpmlint output: bash-4.2$ rpmlint ppsspp.spec ppsspp-v0.9.6_366-1.gitga113abd.fc20.src.rpm ppsspp.spec:10: W: non-standard-group Applications/Games ppsspp.spec:14: W: macro-in-comment %{name} ppsspp.spec:14: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.spec:15: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.spec:17: W: macro-in-comment %{chkoutversion} ppsspp.spec:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.spec:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.spec:55: W: setup-not-quiet ppsspp.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: ppsspp-v0.9.6_366.tar.xz ppsspp.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Playstation -> PlayStation, Play station, Play-station ppsspp.src: W: non-standard-group Applications/Games ppsspp.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog ppsspp.src: W: invalid-url URL ppsspp.org ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission make-ppsspp-from-git.sh 0755L ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission ppsspp.spec 0640L ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission ppsspp.png 0755L ppsspp.src:14: W: macro-in-comment %{name} ppsspp.src:14: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.src:15: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.src:17: W: macro-in-comment %{chkoutversion} ppsspp.src:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.src:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.src:55: W: setup-not-quiet ppsspp.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ppsspp-v0.9.6_366.tar.xz 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 24 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 6 months

1
3
0 / 0

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers August 2017