[Bug 3863] New: Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
Bug #: 3863
Summary: Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for
game data files
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Various games are divided into two logical parts: engine and data.
.
game-data-packager is a tool which builds .rpm files for game
data which cannot be distributed (such as commercial game data).
Almost all ScummVM, Doom, Quake games are supported + others.
http://pkg-games.alioth.debian.org/game-data/
-------------
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/game-data-packager.git/tree/tool...
The RPM support has been added _after_ the last release,
so I temporary use dummy snapshot tarballs until next release.
These are built this way:
git archive --prefix=game-data-packager/ --format tar.gz master >
../rpmbuild/SOURCES/game-data-packager.tar.gz
Which makes rmplint complain:
"game-data-packager.src: W: invalid-url Source0: game-data-packager.tar.gz"
-------------
This tool originated in Debian "contrib", because it's
free software, but of no use without non-free assets;
likewise it doesn't belong in Fedora.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279177 :
"game-data-packager's sole purpose is to repackage non-free game resources into
distro packages. As such it has no place in Fedora itself."
---------------------------
remaining rpmlint:
game-data-packager.noarch: E: zero-length
/etc/game-data-packager/quake3-mirrors
well, maybe GDP should use data from filewatcher to enhance it's mirror
lists.
either at build-time (bad, need internet acces), from time to time,
or at run time. We have SHA1 hashes for files, so the source doesn't
much matter.
http://www.filewatcher.com/m/linuxq3apoint-1.32b-3.x86.run.30923961-0.html
game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/game-data-packager
that's not a script intended to be run,
but a script fragement to be sourced
game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/games/__init__.py
game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/version.py
game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/paths.py
these are generated during the build, a shebang could be added too
-----
This is my first RPM Fusion package.
-------
upstream Makefile lacks a "make install" rule;
having this would allow to trim the specfile.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 month
[Bug 4041] New: Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041
Bug #: 4041
Summary: Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mark.harfouche(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
This is a repackaged version of what is available
on the Mendeley website and attempts to make use
of system libraries instead of the ones packaged
with Mendeley.
srpm:
http://markharfouche.com/~makerpm/mendeleydesktop-1.16.1-2.fc23.src.rpm
Source rpmlint:
$ rpmlint /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mendeleydesktop-1.16.1-2.fc23.src.rpm
mendeleydesktop.src: W: invalid-license Proprietary
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Binary rpmlint:
$ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-23-x86_64/result/mendeleydesktop-1.16.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm
mendeleydesktop.x86_64: W: invalid-license Proprietary
mendeleydesktop.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libPDFNetC.so
libPDFNetC.so
mendeleydesktop.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libPDFNetC.so
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
mendeleydesktop.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libMendeley.so.1.16.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
mendeleydesktop.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mendeleydesktop
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.
Justification for errors:
W: invalid-license: Proprietary license is why I need RPMFusion
E: invalid-soname can't change that. The source is a binary.
W: shared-lib-calls-exit: I don't know what this means. I don't think I can
change it
W: no-manual-page-for-binary: I don't think this is necessary. Also, this was a
binary software.
$ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-23-x86_64/result/mendeleydesktop-devel-1.16.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm
mendeleydesktop-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Proprietary
mendeleydesktop-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
mendeleydesktop-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib <- I don't know what this means
W: no-documentation <- this is a devel package
My first RPMFusion package. I am seeking a sponsor.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 year, 3 months
[Bug 3576] New: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
Bug #: 3576
Summary: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software
Studio
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2, 30
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio.spec
Open Broadcaster Software is free and open source software for video recording
and live streaming.
OBS is not in Fedora because it depends on ffmpeg and other non free software.
I need to be sponsored as this is my first package and I'm not sponsored in
Fedora.
OBS studio has some issues with placing files in correct location, there was a
discussion about this (https://github.com/jp9000/obs-studio/pull/391). I think
that all of these errors are related to this.
rpmlint outputs:
$ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
obs-studio.src:33: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so*
obs-studio.src:54: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs
obs-studio.src:62: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobsglad.so
obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobs.so
obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libobs-opengl.so
obs-studio.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/obs-studio/COPYING
obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 year, 6 months
[Bug 4363] New: Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Bug ID: 4363
Summary: Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld -
Chromium media libraries built with all possible
codecs
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: alexjnewt(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/chromium-libs-media-freeworl...
SRPM URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/chromium-libs-media-freeworl...
Description:
Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs. Chromium is an
open-source web browser, powered by WebKit (Blink). This package replaces
the default chromium-libs-media package, which is limited in what it
can include.
RPMlint output:
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codecs ->
codes, coders, code's
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
codecs -> codes, coders, code's
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:227: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/libc.so
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:879: W: macro-in-comment %{target}
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:90: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces:
line 90, tab: line 60)
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: invalid-url Source2:
depot_tools.git-master.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
None of this really matters too much. As for the hardcoded-library-path error,
please read the note in the spec for more details. The
mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs is trivial and will be fixed in the next revision.
This package is mostly based off of the chromium package but has been trimmed
down to only really include the two codec libraries that Fedora will not
provide for legal reasons. I'm sure I'm probably building too much and things
can be trimmed down.
Note that this package takes forever to compile, but as I said, the spec likely
needs to be cleaned up, but feedback is welcome for sure. This will likely go
into rpmfusion free, but I'll be honest, I need to look into the source a bit
more as there maybe some nonfree bits.
I'll continue to work on it, I just wanted to upload something that built, so I
can get feedback.
One issue that should be addressed though; chromium depends on
chromium-libs-media, which this package provides as an alternative to the
trimmed down fedora version. I would think if chromium updates without this
packaging being updated, this package would be removed by the updater, while if
this package updates before chromium, it would cause broken dependencies.
EItherway, having rpmfusion's packages out of sync with Fedora's would no so
nice.
Perhaps a "chromium-freeworld" package would be better? The maintainer for
chromium has made it painfully easy to package a freeworld version, so this
wouldn't be too bad. I'll run a build of a chromium-freeworld package overnight
for testing, as I'm sort of leaning towards this being a better option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 year, 9 months
[Bug 3954] New: Review request: nordlicht - Create colorful barcodes from video files
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3954
Bug #: 3954
Summary: Review request: nordlicht - Create colorful barcodes
from video files
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: ngompa13(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/nordlicht.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description:
nordlicht is for converting video files into colorful barcodes. It is inspired
by the Moviebarcode Tumblr, but aims at the next logical step: Integrating
these barcodes into video players to make navigation faster and more precise.
Why nordlicht isn't eligible to be included in Fedora:
nordlicht depends on FFmpeg, which is not included in Fedora, but is included
in RPM Fusion.
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint nordlicht.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.src.rpm
nordlicht.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) barcodes -> bar codes,
bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
nordlicht.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar codes,
bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
nordlicht.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) barcodes -> bar codes,
bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
nordlicht.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar
codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-libs-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
nordlicht-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar
codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-devel-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
nordlicht-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib [Ignored because
pkgconfig file and symlink .so belong in devel]
nordlicht-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation [Ignored because documentation is
included in the libs package, which is Required by the devel package]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
This is my first RPM Fusion package, but I've been a packager in Fedora for
several years (FAS: ngompa).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 year, 11 months
[Bug 4186] New: scid - A chess database application
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4186
Bug #: 4186
Summary: scid - A chess database application
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: sergio(a)serjux.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC: http://www.serjux.com/rpms/scid.spec
SRPM: http://www.serjux.com/rpms/scid-4.6.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
I will be able to add this package , the scid.spec is the same made by Mikhail
Kalenkov , I just update it to 4.6.2
Scid can perform many different searches, such as for particular
players, a certain opening position, material searches, and pattern
searches such as isolated pawns. It is very fast, because it uses its
own efficient format, but it can convert games to and from PGN, the
standard format for chess game files.
Scid can use a chess engine such as Crafty to analyze games and also
has a "tree" mode where it automatically shows all moves played from
the current position, their opening codes, success rates, etc.
Why not in Fedora:
Scid package has some small part of nonfree code. It is Nalimov
tablebase decoding code. Nalimov tablebases may be very important in the
endgame
analysis.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 year, 11 months
[Bug 3430] New: Review request: qtads - Multimedia interpreter for Tads games
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3430
Bug #: 3430
Summary: Review request: qtads - Multimedia interpreter for
Tads games
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: valtri(a)civ.zcu.cz
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/qtads-2.1.6-1/qtads.spec
SRPM URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/qtads-2.1.6-1/qtads-2.1.6-1.fc22.src.rpm
Description: QTads is a cross-platform, multimedia interpreter for Tads games,
compatible with HTML TADS. Both Tads versions in use today (Tads 2 and Tads 3)
are supported.
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: non-commercial
license of the bundled parts (tads2, tads3, htmltads)
Rpmlint:
qtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(md5-deutsch-c++)
qtads.src:26: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(sha2-gladman)
qtads.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qtads/qtads-2.1.6.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not
Found
qtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/qtads/COPYING
qtads.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/qtads/HTML_TADS_LICENSE
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssoundogg.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadssound.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysframe.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/dispwidget.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/settings.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswingroup.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/confdialog.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysimagejpeg.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/hos_qt.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadstimer.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysframe.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssoundwav.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/settings.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswinaboutbox.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadsimage.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswinaboutbox.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysfont.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssoundmpeg.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/main.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/dispwidget.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/hos_qt.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadshostifc.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/dispwidgetinput.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswin.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/dispwidgetinput.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadssound.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/missing.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysimagemng.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysimage.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssound.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syssoundmidi.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswingroup.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/sysimagepng.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/confdialog.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/missing.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswin.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswininput.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/oemqt.c
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/osqt.cc
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/qtadsimage.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/osqt.h
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/qtads-2.1.6/src/syswininput.h
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 44 errors, 9 warnings.
invalid-license: non-free licenses are not known to rpmlint
unversioned-explicit-provides: these bundled pieces has no version (it is also
in other packages)
incorrect-fsf-address: reported here: https://github.com/realnc/qtads/pull/3
invalid-url: temporary outtage I guess? we can change it to github (where the
tarbal is generated though)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
2 years
[Bug 4444] New: firebird-emu - Third-party emulator for ARM-based TI
calculators
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4444
Bug ID: 4444
Summary: firebird-emu - Third-party emulator for ARM-based TI
calculators
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: rosser.bjr(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Source URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/rpmfusion/firebird/firebird-emu.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/rpmfusion/firebird/firebird-emu-1.2-1...
Description: This project is the community, third-party TI Nspire emulator,
Texas Instruments' ARM-based series of graphing calculators.
It supports the emulation of Touchpad, CX and CX CAS calcs on
Android, iOS, Linux, Mac and Windows.
FAS Username: tc01
Why not in Fedora: firebird-emu is pure FOSS, but not only does it require TI's
proprietary operating system for the Nspire line of calculators, but also the
proprietary boot/base code blobs from the calculator itself. Thus as per the
emulator policy, since this package isn't functional without any proprietary
blobs, I believe this package still needs to be in RPM Fusion.
rpmlint output:
firebird-emu.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US calcs -> calls,
calms, calks
firebird-emu.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iOS -> OS, SOS, DOS
firebird-emu.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US calcs -> calls,
calms, calks
firebird-emu.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iOS -> OS, SOS,
DOS
firebird-emu.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary firebird
firebird-emu.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary firebird-send
Note: upstream usually uses the name "firebird" for this package, but the name
"firebird" belongs to another package in Fedora, so I opted for "firebird-emu"
(as this name is also sometimes used by upstream).
There is a potential for name conflicts. Currently the firebird package
installs a %{_sbindir}/firebird [1]. This package installs a
%{_bindir}/firebird. This doesn't cause a conflict per _se_, but if both are on
$PATH there's a potential for confusion. Should I rename the binary from
firebird -> firebird-emu as well?
As far as I can tell, the packages do not currently conflict in any other way.
The current firebird-emu filelist is:
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/firebird
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/firebird-send
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/share/applications/firebird.desktop
drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/firebird-emu
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firebird-emu/README.md
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firebird-emu/TODO.md
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/icons/firebird.png
drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/licenses/firebird-emu
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/licenses/firebird-emu/LICENSE
[1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/firebird.git/tree/firebird.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
2 years