[Bug 5114] New: Review request: ungoogled-chromium - Chromium, sans
integration with Google
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
Bug ID: 5114
Summary: Review request: ungoogled-chromium - Chromium, sans
integration with Google
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: dotqvint(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2, 30
namespace: free
Full URLs to the spec file, source RPM and binary RPM:
-
https://ungoogled.blob.core.windows.net/ungoogled/review/2018-12-18_1/ung...
-
https://ungoogled.blob.core.windows.net/ungoogled/review/2018-12-18_1/ung...
-
https://ungoogled.blob.core.windows.net/ungoogled/review/2018-12-18_1/ung...
A short description for the package:
ungoogled-chromium is Chromium, sans integration with Google. It also
features
some tweaks to enhance privacy, control, and transparency (almost all of
which
require manual activation or enabling).
ungoogled-chromium retains the default Chromium experience as closely as
possible. Unlike other Chromium forks that have their own visions of a web
browser, ungoogled-chromium is essentially a drop-in replacement for
Chromium.
This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora because of proprietary
codecs.
This is my first RPM Fusion package. I wish to keep on improving it. I also
seek
a sponsor as I'm not a Fedora sponsored packager nor an RPM Fusion sponsored
packager.
-----------------------
rpmlint on source RPM
-----------------------
This package is primarily based on Tom Callaway's <spot(a)fedoraproject.org>
work.
All rpmlint warnings and errors are also reproducible for the source RPM of the
Fedora `chromium` package.
* E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libc.so
Caused by this line:
BuildRequires: /lib/libc.so.6 /usr/lib/libc.so
Tom Callaway commented it as follows:
# Really, this is what we want:
# BuildRequires: glibc-devel(x86-32) libgcc(x86-32)
# But, koji only offers glibc32. Maybe that's enough.
# This BR will pull in either glibc.i686 or glibc32.
* W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(boringssl)
* W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(bspatch)
* W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(crashpad)
* W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(dmg_fp)
* W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(iccjpeg)
* W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(mozc)
* W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(re2)
* W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(skia)
* W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(xdg-mime)
* W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(xdg-user-dirs)
These warnings are caused by `Provides: bundled(...)` lines. Chromium uses
its
own forks of third-party libraries -- unbundling or versioning seem to be
impossible.
* E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{chromium_browser_channel}
* E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/%{chromium_browser_channel}/%{chromium_browser_channel}.sh
* E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/chrome-sandbox
These errors are caused by `semanage` invocations:
semanage fcontext -a -t bin_t /usr/lib/%{chromium_browser_channel}
semanage fcontext -a -t bin_t
/usr/lib/%{chromium_browser_channel}/%{chromium_browser_channel}.sh
semanage fcontext -a -t chrome_sandbox_exec_t /usr/lib/chrome-sandbox
Tom Callaway commented that semanage itself adjusts the lib directory naming.
* W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 60, tab: line 98)
* W: invalid-url Source2: depot_tools.git-master.tar.gz
Revision of the file is accessible only from the Fedora Lookaside Cache.
-----------------------
rpmlint on x86_64 RPM
-----------------------
The most of the following warnings and errors are reproducible for the Fedora
`chromium` package.
* E: explicit-lib-dependency libcanberra-gtk3(x86-64)
Chromium expects this GTK module for some reason.
* W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/chrome-sandbox
* W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/chromedriver
* W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/headless_shell
* W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/protoc
* W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/swiftshader/libEGL.so
* W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/swiftshader/libGLESv2.so
* W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/ungoogled-chromium
I'm not sure how to resolve this. Fedora package has similar warnings.
* W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ungoogled-chromium/master_preferences
Contains distro-specific settings, noreplace flag seems to be needless.
* E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid
/usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/chrome-sandbox
* E: missing-call-to-chdir-with-chroot
/usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/ungoogled-chromium
* E: missing-call-to-chdir-with-chroot
/usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/headless_shell
* E: setuid-binary /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/chrome-sandbox root 4755
* E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/chrome-sandbox
4755
I'm not sure what can I do here. Both Fedora package and chromium-vaapi have
similar errors.
* E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/pyproto/google/protobuf/internal/__init__.py
* E: htaccess-file /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/resources/inspector/.htaccess
* E: zero-length
/usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/resources/inspector/emulated_devices/emulated_devices_module.js
* E: zero-length
/usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/resources/inspector/js_profiler/js_profiler_module.js
* E: zero-length
/usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/resources/inspector/node_debugger/node_debugger_module.js
Resource files.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2
[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30
[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 days, 22 hours
Devtoolset available in rpmfusion el7 buildroot
by Nicolas Chauvet
Hi,
With the current work to update ffmpeg to 3.x in el7 I expect that new
application could be enabled on el7. Because some might requires an
even newer compiler than the base one, please remind that the
devtoolset scl is available. You can use a gcc 7 without much effort
using that.
(have a look at the chromium or vlc package for a sample).
Thx for your notice
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
1 month, 1 week
[Bug 5079] New: Review request: wiringpi - PIN based GPIO access
library for BCM283x SoC devices
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5079
Bug ID: 5079
Summary: Review request: wiringpi - PIN based GPIO access
library for BCM283x SoC devices
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: arm
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: zonexpertconsulting(a)outlook.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: rpi
Why not Fedora?
---------------
This package is for the raspberry pi only which makes it too specific for the
Fedora repos but ideally suited for the new RPM Fusion rpi namespace
SPECFILE
---------
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/knight-of-ni/specfiles/master/wiringpi....
SOURCE RPM
----------
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/4424/274424/wiringpi-2.46-...
Description
-------------
WiringPi is a PIN based GPIO access library for the BCM2835, BCM2836 and
BCM2837 SoC devices (Raspberry Pi devices). It is usable from C,
C++ and RTB (BASIC) as well as many other languages with suitable
wrappers.
NOTES
-----
This is a modification of the wiringpi specfile from FedBerry, authored by
Vaughan Agrez.
upstream scm is using git, not github. Tarball is checked out via commit but
represents release 2.46.
%install is using the custom target "install-fedora" so not using %make_install
macro
At one point FedBerry called this package "wiringpi-libs", then transitioned to
just "wiringpi". Obsoletes and Conflicts statements were added to prevent
issues. I left these statements in the specfile. Let me know if you don't think
this is necessary.
RPMLINT
--------
$ rpmlint /home/abauer/rpmbuild/SRPMS/wiringpi-2.46-4.fc28.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint /home/abauer/rpmbuild/RPMS/armv7hl/wiringpi*.rpm
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 month, 2 weeks
[Bug 5269] New: Scaling, colorspace conversion, and dithering
library
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5269
Bug ID: 5269
Summary: Scaling, colorspace conversion, and dithering library
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: zawertun(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: free
Created attachment 2042
--> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=2042&action=edit
libzimg.spec
This package required to build VapourSynth.
I will submit spec for VapourSynth later.
SPEC: attached
SRPM:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/zawertun/scrapyard/fedora...
Scratch build in my copr:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/zawertun/scrapyard/build/911445/.
Rpmlint report:
$ rpmlint ../libzimg/libzimg.spec libzimg-2.8-1.fc30.src.rpm
libzimg-2.8-1.f30.x86_64.rpm
libzimg.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) colorspace -> color space,
color-space, colors pace
libzimg.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US colorspace -> color space,
color-space, colors pace
libzimg.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) colorspace -> color space,
color-space, colors pace
libzimg.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US colorspace -> color
space, color-space, colors pace
libzimg.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.8-1 ['2.8-1.zawertun.f30',
'2.8-1.zawertun.f30']
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 month, 3 weeks
RPM Fusion update report 2019-06-27
by noreply＠rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
chromium-vaapi-75.0.3770.100-1.fc29
telegram-desktop-1.7.10-1.fc29
vdr-skindesigner-1.2.8-1.fc29
Pushed to stable:
audacity-freeworld-2.3.2-1.fc29
obs-studio-23.2.1-1.fc29
vdr-burn-0.3.0-12.fc29
vdr-markad-0.1.4-22.20170313gitea2e182.fc29
vdr-mp3-0.10.2-20.fc29
vdr-mpv-0.0.4-10.fc29
vdr-plex-0.4.0-11.fc29
vdr-skindesigner-1.2.7-9.fc29
vdr-softhddevice-0.6.1-20.20151103git6dfa88a.fc29
vdr-softhddevice-openglosd-0.6.1-22.20160717git569fde5.fc29
vdr-tvguideng-0.3.0-11.fc29
vdr-vaapidevice-0.7.0-11.20180401gita17c110.fc29
vdr-weatherforecast-0.2.0-10.fc29
vdr-xineliboutput-2.1.0-13.20190607git021d0fc.fc29
Fedora 30
-------------
Pushed to testing:
mpv-0.29.1-6.fc30
shotcut-19.06.15-1.fc30
telegram-desktop-1.7.10-1.fc30
vdr-skindesigner-1.2.8-1.fc30
Pushed to stable:
audacity-freeworld-2.3.2-1.fc30
chromium-vaapi-75.0.3770.100-1.fc30
obs-studio-23.2.1-1.fc30
vdr-burn-0.3.0-12.fc30
vdr-markad-0.1.4-22.20170313gitea2e182.fc30
vdr-mp3-0.10.2-20.fc30
vdr-mpv-0.0.4-10.fc30
vdr-plex-0.4.0-11.fc30
vdr-skindesigner-1.2.7-9.fc30
vdr-softhddevice-0.6.1-20.20151103git6dfa88a.fc30
vdr-softhddevice-openglosd-0.6.1-22.20160717git569fde5.fc30
vdr-tvguideng-0.3.0-11.fc30
vdr-vaapidevice-0.7.0-11.20180401gita17c110.fc30
vdr-weatherforecast-0.2.0-10.fc30
vdr-xineliboutput-2.1.0-13.20190607git021d0fc.fc30
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
libopenshot-0.2.3-3.20190406git101f25a.el7
Pushed to stable:
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
lpf-flash-plugin-32.0.0.207-1.fc29
Fedora 30
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
lpf-flash-plugin-32.0.0.207-1.fc30
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
3 months, 3 weeks
