June 2020 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 5076] New: Review Request: intel-media-driver - GStreamer 1.0 streaming media framework "bad" cuda plug-ins

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5076 Bug ID: 5076 Summary: Review Request: intel-media-driver - GStreamer 1.0 streaming media framework "bad" cuda plug-ins Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: cuda SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-cuda-1.14.4-2.fc29.sr... SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-cuda.spec Summary: GStreamer 1.0 streaming media framework "bad" cuda plug-ins I've managed to build this one locally , but for some reason it still fails to install the appropriate cuda-9-2 packages using the f29-cuda build target... https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=274182 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 months, 2 weeks

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 4761] New: Tracking: Deepin Desktop related package review tracker

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4761 Bug ID: 4761 Summary: Tracking: Deepin Desktop related package review tracker Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: sztsian(a)gmail.com Reporter: sztsian(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org, sensor.wen(a)gmail.com Depends on: 4749, 4750, 4760 namespace: free This is a tracker for tracking Deepin Desktop related package review request. See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465889 for Fedora. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4749 [Bug 4749] Review request: deepin-movie - Deepin Movie based on mpv https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4750 [Bug 4750] Review request: deepin-music - Deepin Music Player https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4760 [Bug 4760] Review request: deepin-voice-recorder - Deepin Voice Recorder -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

8 months, 1 week

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 2842] New: Review request: openssl-freeworld - Utilities from the general purpose cryptography library with TLS implementation

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842 Bug #: 2842 Summary: Review request: openssl-freeworld - Utilities from the general purpose cryptography library with TLS implementation Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jeffmendoza(a)live.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org http://jm-workhorse.cloudapp.net/rpmfusion/openssl-freeworld/openssl-free... http://jm-workhorse.cloudapp.net/rpmfusion/openssl-freeworld/openssl-free... This is the freeworld version of Fedora's openssl, which includes the EC cipher. The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between machines. OpenSSL includes a certificate management tool and shared libraries which provide various cryptographic algorithms and protocols. >From http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist Request: OpenSSL with Elliptic Curve, IDEA, MDC-2, RC5 crypto algorithms Summary: The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between machines. URL: http://www.openssl.org/ Why not in Fedora: Because of the problem with software patents: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901 Notes: OpenSSL is included in Fedora but with Elliptic Curve, IDEA, MDC-2, RC5 crypto algorithms disabled. rpmlint: srpm: openssl-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission make-dummy-cert 0755L openssl-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission renew-dummy-cert 0755L openssl-freeworld.src:159: W: macro-in-comment %patch40 openssl-freeworld.src:165: W: macro-in-comment %patch56 openssl-freeworld.src:166: W: macro-in-comment %patch58 openssl-freeworld.src:171: W: macro-in-comment %patch68 openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:278: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:278: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:278: W: macro-in-comment %{soversion} openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:280: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:280: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:280: W: macro-in-comment %{soversion} openssl-freeworld.src:415: W: macro-in-comment %attr openssl-freeworld.src:415: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:416: W: macro-in-comment %attr openssl-freeworld.src:416: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:196: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 196) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 26 warnings. The macro-in-comments are from commenting out lines from the original Fedora spec. The rest are from the original. binary rpms: openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.1e-4 ['1:1.0.1e-4.fc18', '1:1.0.1e-4'] openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/openssl openssl-freeworld.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/pki/CA/private 0700L openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/openssl-freeworld-1.0.1e/CHANGES openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/tls/certs/Makefile openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: install-file-in-docs /usr/share/doc/openssl-freeworld-1.0.1e/INSTALL openssl-freeworld-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided openssl openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libgost.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libpadlock.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libubsec.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libchil.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libcapi.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libgmp.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libaep.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libsureware.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/libssl.so.1.0.1e openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/lib4758cca.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libcswift.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libatalla.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libnuron.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/libcrypto.so.1.0.1e openssl-freeworld-perl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary c_rehash openssl-freeworld-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 26 warnings. This is all from the original. I don't know why the binaries aren't getting stripped. I might try to clean some of this up, even if it means more changes from the Fedora spec. This is my first RPM Fusion package, and I'm seeking a sponsor. I'm not a Fedora sponsored packager either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 months, 1 week

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 5164] New: Review request: Stansoft - A text-based financial accounting system

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5164 Bug ID: 5164 Summary: Review request: Stansoft - A text-based financial accounting system Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: rpm(a)stansoft.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 namespace: free http://download.stansoft.org/files/stansoft.spec http://download.stansoft.org/files/stansoft-7.15-1.fc29.src.rpm Stansoft is a Linux, text-based, double-entry financial accounting system. It includes payroll for both the U.S. and UK PAYE RTI. This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it is not open source. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

9 months

1
38
0 / 0

[Bug 5473] New: Review Request: zerotier-one - Smart Ethernet Switch for Earth

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5473 Bug ID: 5473 Summary: Review Request: zerotier-one - Smart Ethernet Switch for Earth Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 namespace: free Previous attempt in here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768452 This is useful app and IMHO nice to have it rpm fusion repos. This is my first rpm fusion package. Reason why not in Fedora repos: BSL license Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/zerotier-one/fedora-... SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/zerotier-one/fedora-... Description: ZeroTier is a smart programmable Ethernet switch for planet Earth. It allows all networked devices, VMs, containers, and applications to communicate as if they all reside in the same physical data center or cloud region. This is accomplished by combining a cryptographically addressed and secure peer to peer network (termed VL1) with an Ethernet emulation layer somewhat similar to VXLAN (termed VL2). Our VL2 Ethernet virtualization layer includes advanced enterprise SDN features like fine grained access control rules for network micro-segmentation and security monitoring. All ZeroTier traffic is encrypted end-to-end using secret keys that only you control. Most traffic flows peer to peer, though we offer free (but slow) relaying for users who cannot establish peer to peer connections. The goals and design principles of ZeroTier are inspired by among other things the original Google BeyondCorp paper and the Jericho Forum with its notion of "deperimeterization." Fedora Account System Username: atim Working COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/zerotier-one/ Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year

1
29
0 / 0

[Bug 5122] New: Review Request: omxplayer - Raspberry Pi command line OMX player

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5122 Bug ID: 5122 Summary: Review Request: omxplayer - Raspberry Pi command line OMX player Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: arm OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: zonexpertconsulting(a)outlook.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: rpi FAS account: kni WHY NOT FEDORA? --------------- This package needs ffmpeg, in addition to raspberrypi-vc. SPEC URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/knight-of-ni/specfiles/master/omxplayer... SRPM URL: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3453/283453/omxplayer-2018... DESCRIPTION ----------- OMXPlayer is a video player specifically made for the Raspberry Pi's GPU. It relies on the OpenMAX hardware acceleration API, which is the Broadcom's VideoCore officially supported API for GPU video/audio processing. NOTES ----- - I have removed the bundled ffmpeg requirement. The package builds against the ffmpeg package in the rpi namespace. - This package has no cmake or autotools. Just a Makefile. The Makefile must be altered for compatibility. My preference was to use sed to accomplish this, rather than patch files. I found it easier to manipulate the compiler flags this way as I was testing. - This is still a work in progress. I have not yet run the player, but I do want to start the peer review process to verify my work. PROVIDES --------- $ rpm -q --provides omxplayer-20181014-3.7f3faf6.fc29.armv7hl.rpm omxplayer = 20181014-3.7f3faf6.fc29 omxplayer(armv7hl-32) = 20181014-3.7f3faf6.fc29 REQUIRES -------- $ rpm -q --requires omxplayer-20181014-3.7f3faf6.fc29.armv7hl.rpm /usr/bin/bash fbset gnu-free-sans-fonts ld-linux-armhf.so.3 ld-linux-armhf.so.3(GLIBC_2.4) libasound.so.2 libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9) libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.0rc4) libavcodec.so.58 libavcodec.so.58(LIBAVCODEC_58) libavformat.so.58 libavformat.so.58(LIBAVFORMAT_58) libavutil.so.56 libavutil.so.56(LIBAVUTIL_56) libbcm_host.so libbrcmEGL.so libbrcmGLESv2.so libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.28) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.8) libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-1.so.3(LIBDBUS_1_3) libfreetype.so.6 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.5) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.27) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libopenmaxil.so libpcre.so.1 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.4) librt.so.1 librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.4) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_ARM_1.3.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.11) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.18) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.19) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.20) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.21) libswresample.so.3 libswresample.so.3(LIBSWRESAMPLE_3) libswscale.so.5 libvchiq_arm.so libvcos.so libz.so.1 omxplayer-libs(armv7hl-32) = 20181014-3.7f3faf6.fc29 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) RPMLINT -------- >omxplayer.src:80: W: macro-in-comment %{commit_date} >omxplayer.src:81: W: macro-in-comment %{commit_short} >omxplayer.src:83: W: macro-in-comment %{url} This is a false positive caused by the way the specfile generates version.h >omxplayer.armv7hl: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/omxplayer/COPYING PR sent upstream: https://github.com/popcornmix/omxplayer/pull/670 >omxplayer.armv7hl: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/omxplayer.1.gz I'm not how this mangpage ended up with execute bit set. Can look into this if asked to. >omxplayer.armv7hl: W: no-manual-page-for-binary omxplayer.bin False positve. omxplayer is a wrapper for omxplayer.bin. Thus, omxplayer.1 is the man page for this binary. >omxplayer-desktop.armv7hl: E: explicit-lib-dependency libnotify The desktop subpackage has libnotify as an installation requirement. I left it in due to historical reasons. I am not sure why it is there, but I can look into it if asked. >omxplayer-desktop.armv7hl: W: no-documentation This subpackage is nothing but a .desktop file. It doesn't need documentation. >omxplayer-desktop.armv7hl: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/omxplayer.desktop lxterminal The binary is in the base package. >3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 7 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year

2
15
0 / 0

[Bug 4027] New: fs-uae - Amiga emulator with on-screen GUI and online play support

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4027 Bug #: 4027 Summary: fs-uae - Amiga emulator with on-screen GUI and online play support Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae.spec Source RPM: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-2.6.2-1.fc23.... Description: FS-UAE is an Amiga emulator for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X based on UAE/WinUAE, with a focus on emulating games. Features include emulation of Amiga 500, 1200, 4000, CD32 and CDTV, perfectly smooth scrolling on 50Hz displays, support for floppy images in ADF and IPF formats, CD-ROM images in ISO or BIN/CUE format, mounting folders on your computer as Amiga hard drives, support for Picasso 96 drivers for high-color and high-resolution Workbench displays, and more. A unique feature is support for cross-platform online play. You can now play Amiga games against (or with) friends over the Internet. The emulator uses the latest Amiga emulation code from the WinUAE project and requires a moderately fast computer with accelerated graphics (OpenGL) to work. A game pad or joystick is recommended, but not required (FS-UAE can emulate a joystick using the cursor keys and right ctrl/alt keys). Why is this package not eligible to be included in Fedora? Because it depends on packages in RPM Fusion. rpmlint output: [andrea@panoramix SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/fs-uae-2.6.2-1.fc23.src.rpm fs-uae.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ctrl -> ctr, curl, ctr l 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [andrea@panoramix SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/fs-uae-2.6.2-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm fs-uae.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ctrl -> ctr, curl, ctr l fs-uae.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/fs-uae/theme.conf fs-uae.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/fs-uae/share-dir fs-uae.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fs-uae-device-helper fs-uae.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fs-uae 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. [andrea@panoramix SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/fs-uae-debuginfo-2.6.2-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 1 month

1
23
0 / 0

[Bug 5321] New: Review Request: widevine-cdm - Widevine DRM browser plugin

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5321 Bug ID: 5321 Summary: Review Request: widevine-cdm - Widevine DRM browser plugin Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree Spec URL: https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/widevine-cdm/widevine-cdm.spec SRPM URL: https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/widevine-cdm/widevine-cdm-1.4.... Description: Widevine’s DRM solution provides the capability to license, securely distribute and protect playback of content on any consumer device. Content owners, multiple service operators and digital media providers can utilize Widevine’s solutions to ensure revenue generating services keep flowing to whatever device consumers desire. RPM Fusion account name: rathann -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 7 months

1
34
0 / 0

[Bug 2151] New: Review request: perle-serial-kmod - Perle Serial PCI card kernel module(s)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2151 Bug #: 2151 Summary: Review request: perle-serial-kmod - Perle Serial PCI card kernel module(s) Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: philipp(a)redfish-solutions.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Perle Systems makes several PCI and PCIe serial cards, but there support for linux 2.6 and 3.x is lacking. This package patches their driver tarball and builds it as per rpmfusion as kmod. ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/pub/perle-serial-kmod.spec ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/pub/perle-serial-kmod-3.8.0-6.1.fc16.1.sr... == description == This package provides a driver for the family of Perle serial cards. The cards supported are: Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, 8i, and 16 cards Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, 8i, and 16 SI cards Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, and 8i Express cards Perle PCI-RAS V.92 (4 and 8 port) cards Perle Speed1, 2, 4, and 8 LE cards Read /usr/share/doc/perle-serial/README for more info. ==== This is a kmod package, and as such can't be included in Fedora. ==== $ rpmlint perle-serial-kmod.spec perle-serial-kmod.spec:44: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 44, tab: line 6) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ The spaces come as a result of cut&paste of taking the description directly from upstream files. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/*perle-serial* kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C perle-serial kernel module(s) for 3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64 kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64/extra/perle-serial/perle-serial.ko kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-perle-serial.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage kmod-perle-serial.x86_64: W: no-documentation perle-serial-kmod-common.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) userland -> user land, user-land, slanderous perle-serial-kmod-common.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Userland -> User land, User-land, Slanderous perle-serial-kmod-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/perle-serial-kmod-3.8.0/_kmod_build_3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64/perle-serial.c 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings. $ "Userland" and "Metapackage" are legitimate words in this lexicon. The wrong FSF address in perle-serial.c is directly from the upstream sources. Kernel modules are unstripped (or they wouldn't load otherwise). The not capitalized warning applies to a string that's generated from a macro. The documentation is in the -common package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 7 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2221] New: Review request: libarea - Library that allows for creating tool paths for pocketing

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2221 Bug #: 2221 Summary: Review request: libarea - Library that allows for creating tool paths for pocketing Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: SpikeFedora(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libarea/libarea.spec SRPM URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libarea/libarea-0.0.2-0.1.20111215git599996... Description: LibAREA is a library that allows for creating tool paths for pocketing. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: "Some software is not functional or useful without the presence of external code dependencies in the runtime operating system environment. When those external code dependencies are non-free, legally unacceptable, or binary-only [...], then the dependent software is not acceptable for inclusion in Fedora"[1] Since atm only HeeksCNC uses this lib and HeeksCNC depends on OCE (HeeksCNC->HeeksCAD-devel->OCE-devel), which is considered non-free, I assume the term "not useful" applies here. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines rpmlint output: SPECS/libarea.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libarea-svnHEAD.tar.bz2 libarea.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libarea-svnHEAD.tar.bz2 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Upstream doesn't provide a release package tarball. Careful: I usually don't do any python packaging. Here be dragons! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 7 months

1
5
0 / 0

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers June 2020