February 2021 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 5779] New: Review Request: Kernel modules for Realtek RTL8821CE wifi Driver

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5779 Bug ID: 5779 Summary: Review Request: Kernel modules for Realtek RTL8821CE wifi Driver Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: sergio(a)serjux.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SPEC URL: https://www.serjux.com/rpms/rtl8821ce-kmod.spec SRPM URL: https://www.serjux.com/rpms/rtl8821ce-kmod-0.1-1.20201006.gitfe97b50.fc31... Description: Kernel modules for Realtek RTL8821CE wifi Driver wifi drives for Lenovo Ideapad FAS login: sergiomb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

2 weeks, 3 days

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 5782] New: Review Request: rtl8821ce userland package for Realtek RTL8821CE wifi Driver

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5782 Bug ID: 5782 Summary: Review Request: rtl8821ce userland package for Realtek RTL8821CE wifi Driver Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: sergio(a)serjux.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SPEC URL: https://www.serjux.com/rpms/rtl8821ce.spec SRPM URL: https://www.serjux.com/rpms/rtl8821ce-0.1-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Kernel modules for Realtek RTL8821CE wifi Driver wifi drives for Lenovo Ideapad -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

2 weeks, 3 days

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 5804] New: Review Request: slowmovideo - Tool that uses optical flow for generating slow-motion videos

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5804 Bug ID: 5804 Summary: Review Request: slowmovideo - Tool that uses optical flow for generating slow-motion videos Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/slowmovideo.spec SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/slowmovideo-0.6.0-1.20200516git279026a.fc31.... Summary: Tool that uses optical flow for generating slow-motion videos This package is in free because it relies on ffmpeg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 month, 2 weeks

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 5932] New: Review Request: libndi - Open-source library done to interact with NDI streams

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5932 Bug ID: 5932 Summary: Review Request: libndi - Open-source library done to interact with NDI streams Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SRPM: https://dl.kwizart.net/review/libndi-0.0.1-2.gitc14b40c.fc33.src.rpm SPEC: https://dl.kwizart.net/review/libndi.spec Summary: Open-source library done to interact with NDI streams This package depends on ffmpeg so belong to 'free' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 month, 2 weeks

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 5933] New: Review Request: obs-ndi - Network A/V in OBS Studio with NewTek's NDI technology

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5933 Bug ID: 5933 Summary: Review Request: obs-ndi - Network A/V in OBS Studio with NewTek's NDI technology Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SRPM: https://dl.kwizart.net/review/obs-ndi-4.9.1-1.fc33.src.rpm SPEC: https://dl.kwizart.net/review/obs-ndi.spec Summary: Network A/V in OBS Studio with NewTek's NDI technology This package relies on obs-studio to build to rely on the 'free' section. Also note that despite there is a free libndi implementation, one will likely rely on the ndi-sdk (nonfree) component that will be dlopened. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 month, 2 weeks

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 5934] New: Review Request: ndi-sdk - NewTek NDI SDK

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5934 Bug ID: 5934 Summary: Review Request: ndi-sdk - NewTek NDI SDK Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: nonfree SRPM: https://dl.kwizart.net/review/ndi-sdk-4.6.1-1.fc33.src.rpm SPEC: https://dl.kwizart.net/review/ndi-sdk.spec Summary: NewTek NDI SDK This package is proprietary so belong to the 'nonfree' section. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 month, 2 weeks

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 5937] New: Review Request: welle-io - Receiver for DAB and DAB+ broadcast radio

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5937 Bug ID: 5937 Summary: Review Request: welle-io - Receiver for DAB and DAB+ broadcast radio Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: marcus_rpmfusion(a)hostalia.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free Spec: https://pagure.io/fork/marcusmueller/fedora-welle-io/blob/master/f/welle-... SRPM: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/marcusmueller/Welle.io/build/2024... Description: Receive digital audio broadcasts with your computer: welle.io is an open source DAB and DAB+ software defined radio (SDR) with direct support for RTL-SDR and other SDR hardware through SoapySDR. It supports high DPI and touch displays and it runs even on cheap computers. This package is not eligible for inclusion in fedora, as it depends on faad2 (like the other DAB receiver software, gr-dab, that was reviewed for inclusion in rpmfusion). rpmlint srpm: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint rpm: W: no-manual-page-for-binary welle-cli W: no-manual-page-for-binary welle-io 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Explanation for ignored warnings: no upstream manpages, welle-io is a GUI executable, and welle-cli a somewhat self-documenting HTTP serving frontend This is my first rpmfusion package. I'm co-maint on fedora's verilator, and have a package in the fedora review pipeline (signify). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

2 months, 1 week

1
2
0 / 0

RPM Fusion update report 2021-02-28

by noreply＠rpmfusion.org

RPM Fusion update report ------------------------ Section free: ------------- Fedora 32 ------------- Pushed to testing: mythtv-31.0-15.139.20210226gitb6ddf202a4.fc32 shotcut-21.02.27-1.fc32 vdr-markad-2.6.3-1.fc32 vdr-softhddevice-1.0.14-1.fc32 Pushed to stable: shotcut-21.02.15-1.fc32 v4l2loopback-0.12.5-2.fc32 v4l2loopback-kmod-0.12.5-3.fc32 xtables-addons-3.15-1.fc32 xtables-addons-kmod-3.15-1.fc32 Fedora 33 ------------- Pushed to testing: mythtv-31.0-15.139.20210226gitb6ddf202a4.fc33 shotcut-21.02.27-1.fc33 vdr-markad-2.6.3-1.fc33 vdr-softhddevice-1.0.14-1.fc33 Pushed to stable: shotcut-21.02.15-1.fc33 telegram-desktop-2.6.1-1.fc33 tg_owt-0-7.20210203gita198773.fc33 v4l2loopback-0.12.5-2.fc33 v4l2loopback-0.12.5-3.fc32 v4l2loopback-0.12.5-3.fc33 v4l2loopback-kmod-0.12.5-3.fc33 xtables-addons-3.15-1.fc33 xtables-addons-kmod-3.15-1.fc33 Fedora 34 ------------- Pushed to testing: bino-1.6.7-8.fc34 gstreamer1-libav-1.18.2-4.fc34 libopenshot-0.2.5-8.fc34 mythtv-31.0-15.139.20210226gitb6ddf202a4.fc34 rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages-34-1.fc34 shotcut-21.02.27-1.fc34 vdr-markad-2.6.3-1.fc34 vdr-softhddevice-1.0.14-1.fc34 Pushed to stable: chromium-freeworld-88.0.4324.150-1.fc34 deadbeef-1.8.7-1.fc34 gr-dab-0.4-7.fc34 shotcut-21.02.15-1.fc34 telegram-desktop-2.6.1-1.fc34 tg_owt-0-7.20210203gita198773.fc34 v4l2loopback-0.12.5-2.fc34 v4l2loopback-0.12.5-3.fc34 v4l2loopback-kmod-0.12.5-3.fc34 xtables-addons-3.15-1.fc34 xtables-addons-kmod-3.15-1.fc34 EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: mythtv-31.0-15.139.20210226gitb6ddf202a4.el8 v4l2loopback-0.12.5-3.el8 Pushed to stable: v4l2loopback-0.12.5-2.el8 v4l2loopback-kmod-0.12.5-3.el8 xtables-addons-3.15-1.el8 xtables-addons-kmod-3.15-1.el8 Section nonfree: ------------- Fedora 32 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Fedora 33 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Fedora 34 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: nvidia-kmod-460.56-1.el8 nvidia-modprobe-460.56-1.el8 nvidia-persistenced-460.56-1.el8 nvidia-settings-460.56-1.el8 nvidia-xconfig-460.56-1.el8 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-460.56-1.el8 Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org

2 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [mythtv] Update to latest fixes/31.

by Andrew Bauer

The way the specfile pulls in the latest git commit as a patch against the release tarball is new to me. I interpretated that workflow to mean those before me thought it was important to document all the commits that were made. That's why I did not add the patch as a rfpkg source and instead included it with our git history. However, if I do add the patch file as a rfpkg source per the original request, then why bother pulling down the changes as a separate patch at all? Rpmfusion github won't track the changes this way. Why not keep it simple and pull in one tarball that contains everything? Just looking to understand. Le dim. 28 févr. 2021 à 08:08, Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster(a)gmail.com> a écrit : > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 4:14 AM Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> wrote: > > > Maybe we should change the guidelines. > > I suspect your formal proposal will generate some > interesting discussion. I think it will be even more relevant to compress (gz, xz, etc) the patches from upstream Then you can just apply them compressed, the %patch macro will deal with the compression while applying. The reason why I think this is revelant for lookaside is that the patches where already applied/reviewed upstream, So having "peer reviewing", on the rpmfusion mailing list, for any eventual other downstream patch will be hidden or much more difficult. _______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers(a)lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-leave(a)lists.rpmfusion.org

2 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [mythtv] Update to latest fixes/31.

by Sérgio Basto

On Fri, 2021-02-26 at 21:49 +0100, Andrew Bauer wrote: > commit a754140ac1e6b1c4100a29b2bc7437a0339c49b0 > Author: Andrew Bauer <zonexpertconsulting(a)outlook.com> > Date: Fri Feb 26 14:48:19 2021 -0600 > > Update to latest fixes/31. > > mythtv.spec | 13 +- > sources | 3 +- > v31.0..b6ddf202a4.patch | 28604 IMHO, Please use `rfpkg new-sources v31.0..b6ddf202a4.patch` to avoid at least send 28K bytes of text in email, btw sometimes it breaks my gnome evolution Thank you. -- Sérgio M. B.

2 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers February 2021