February 2021 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 5076] New: Review Request: intel-media-driver - GStreamer 1.0 streaming media framework "bad" cuda plug-ins

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5076 Bug ID: 5076 Summary: Review Request: intel-media-driver - GStreamer 1.0 streaming media framework "bad" cuda plug-ins Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: cuda SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-cuda-1.14.4-2.fc29.sr... SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-cuda.spec Summary: GStreamer 1.0 streaming media framework "bad" cuda plug-ins I've managed to build this one locally , but for some reason it still fails to install the appropriate cuda-9-2 packages using the f29-cuda build target... https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=274182 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 4761] New: Tracking: Deepin Desktop related package review tracker

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4761 Bug ID: 4761 Summary: Tracking: Deepin Desktop related package review tracker Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: sztsian(a)gmail.com Reporter: sztsian(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org, sensor.wen(a)gmail.com Depends on: 4749, 4750, 4760 namespace: free This is a tracker for tracking Deepin Desktop related package review request. See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465889 for Fedora. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4749 [Bug 4749] Review request: deepin-movie - Deepin Movie based on mpv https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4750 [Bug 4750] Review request: deepin-music - Deepin Music Player https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4760 [Bug 4760] Review request: deepin-voice-recorder - Deepin Voice Recorder -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 months, 3 weeks

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 2842] New: Review request: openssl-freeworld - Utilities from the general purpose cryptography library with TLS implementation

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842 Bug #: 2842 Summary: Review request: openssl-freeworld - Utilities from the general purpose cryptography library with TLS implementation Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jeffmendoza(a)live.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org http://jm-workhorse.cloudapp.net/rpmfusion/openssl-freeworld/openssl-free... http://jm-workhorse.cloudapp.net/rpmfusion/openssl-freeworld/openssl-free... This is the freeworld version of Fedora's openssl, which includes the EC cipher. The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between machines. OpenSSL includes a certificate management tool and shared libraries which provide various cryptographic algorithms and protocols. >From http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist Request: OpenSSL with Elliptic Curve, IDEA, MDC-2, RC5 crypto algorithms Summary: The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between machines. URL: http://www.openssl.org/ Why not in Fedora: Because of the problem with software patents: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901 Notes: OpenSSL is included in Fedora but with Elliptic Curve, IDEA, MDC-2, RC5 crypto algorithms disabled. rpmlint: srpm: openssl-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission make-dummy-cert 0755L openssl-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission renew-dummy-cert 0755L openssl-freeworld.src:159: W: macro-in-comment %patch40 openssl-freeworld.src:165: W: macro-in-comment %patch56 openssl-freeworld.src:166: W: macro-in-comment %patch58 openssl-freeworld.src:171: W: macro-in-comment %patch68 openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:278: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:278: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:278: W: macro-in-comment %{soversion} openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:280: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openssl-freeworld.src:280: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:280: W: macro-in-comment %{soversion} openssl-freeworld.src:415: W: macro-in-comment %attr openssl-freeworld.src:415: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:416: W: macro-in-comment %attr openssl-freeworld.src:416: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} openssl-freeworld.src:196: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 196) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 26 warnings. The macro-in-comments are from commenting out lines from the original Fedora spec. The rest are from the original. binary rpms: openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.1e-4 ['1:1.0.1e-4.fc18', '1:1.0.1e-4'] openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/openssl openssl-freeworld.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/pki/CA/private 0700L openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/openssl-freeworld-1.0.1e/CHANGES openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/tls/certs/Makefile openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: install-file-in-docs /usr/share/doc/openssl-freeworld-1.0.1e/INSTALL openssl-freeworld-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided openssl openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libgost.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libpadlock.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libubsec.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libchil.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libcapi.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libgmp.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libaep.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libsureware.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/libssl.so.1.0.1e openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/lib4758cca.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libcswift.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libatalla.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libnuron.so openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/libcrypto.so.1.0.1e openssl-freeworld-perl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary c_rehash openssl-freeworld-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic openssl-freeworld-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 26 warnings. This is all from the original. I don't know why the binaries aren't getting stripped. I might try to clean some of this up, even if it means more changes from the Fedora spec. This is my first RPM Fusion package, and I'm seeking a sponsor. I'm not a Fedora sponsored packager either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 months, 3 weeks

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 5923] New: Review Request: v4l2loopback-kmod - Kernel module for v4l2loopback

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5923 Bug ID: 5923 Summary: Review Request: v4l2loopback-kmod - Kernel module for v4l2loopback Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SRPM: https://dl.kwizart.net/review/v4l2loopback-kmod-0.12.5-1.fc33.src.rpm SPEC: https://dl.kwizart.net/review/v4l2loopback-kmod.spec Summary: Kernel module for v4l2loopback This package provides an OOT kernel module. Upstreaming this kernel module was denied from the past because it can be a mean for having proprietary webcam drivers in userspace. This package is useful for obs-studio where the needed obs plugin was merged into the obs code base (so there is no need for the previous obs-v4l2sink plugin. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 months, 3 weeks

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 5937] New: Review Request: welle-io - Receiver for DAB and DAB+ broadcast radio

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5937 Bug ID: 5937 Summary: Review Request: welle-io - Receiver for DAB and DAB+ broadcast radio Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: marcus_rpmfusion(a)hostalia.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free Spec: https://pagure.io/fork/marcusmueller/fedora-welle-io/blob/master/f/welle-... SRPM: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/marcusmueller/Welle.io/build/2024... Description: Receive digital audio broadcasts with your computer: welle.io is an open source DAB and DAB+ software defined radio (SDR) with direct support for RTL-SDR and other SDR hardware through SoapySDR. It supports high DPI and touch displays and it runs even on cheap computers. This package is not eligible for inclusion in fedora, as it depends on faad2 (like the other DAB receiver software, gr-dab, that was reviewed for inclusion in rpmfusion). rpmlint srpm: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint rpm: W: no-manual-page-for-binary welle-cli W: no-manual-page-for-binary welle-io 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Explanation for ignored warnings: no upstream manpages, welle-io is a GUI executable, and welle-cli a somewhat self-documenting HTTP serving frontend This is my first rpmfusion package. I'm co-maint on fedora's verilator, and have a package in the fedora review pipeline (signify). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 months, 3 weeks

1
32
0 / 0

[Bug 5824] New: Review request: etlegacy - Fully compatible client and server for the popular online FPS game Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824 Bug ID: 5824 Summary: Review request: etlegacy - Fully compatible client and server for the popular online FPS game Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 URL: https://www.etlegacy.com/about OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: pemensik(a)redhat.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 namespace: free SPEC URL: https://github.com/pemensik/etlegacy/raw/fedora/etlegacy.spec SRPM URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/srpm/etlegacy-2.76-1.20201026git1ee8c7e... Client is released under GPL, but it still requires original pk3 data, obtained from [2] package. That data are covered by EULA, forbidding commercial use. 1. https://www.etlegacy.com/about 2. https://www.splashdamage.com/games/wolfenstein-enemy-territory/ Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 months, 4 weeks

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 5164] New: Review request: Stansoft - A text-based financial accounting system

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5164 Bug ID: 5164 Summary: Review request: Stansoft - A text-based financial accounting system Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: rpm(a)stansoft.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 namespace: free http://download.stansoft.org/files/stansoft.spec http://download.stansoft.org/files/stansoft-7.15-1.fc29.src.rpm Stansoft is a Linux, text-based, double-entry financial accounting system. It includes payroll for both the U.S. and UK PAYE RTI. This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it is not open source. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 months, 2 weeks

1
38
0 / 0

[Bug 5837] New: Review request: plasma-wallpapers-dynamic - Dynamic wallpaper plugin for KDE Plasma

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5837 Bug ID: 5837 Summary: Review request: plasma-wallpapers-dynamic - Dynamic wallpaper plugin for KDE Plasma Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: i.ucar86(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 namespace: free Spec URL: https://iucar.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/plasma-wallpapers-dynamic.spec SRPM URL: https://iucar.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/plasma-wallpapers-dynamic-3.3.5-1.fc3... Description: A simple dynamic wallpaper plugin for KDE Plasma. Not eligible for Fedora because it requires libheif. This is my first RPM Fusion package. RPM Fusion account name: iucar Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 5473] New: Review Request: zerotier-one - Smart Ethernet Switch for Earth

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5473 Bug ID: 5473 Summary: Review Request: zerotier-one - Smart Ethernet Switch for Earth Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 namespace: free Previous attempt in here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768452 This is useful app and IMHO nice to have it rpm fusion repos. This is my first rpm fusion package. Reason why not in Fedora repos: BSL license Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/zerotier-one/fedora-... SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/zerotier-one/fedora-... Description: ZeroTier is a smart programmable Ethernet switch for planet Earth. It allows all networked devices, VMs, containers, and applications to communicate as if they all reside in the same physical data center or cloud region. This is accomplished by combining a cryptographically addressed and secure peer to peer network (termed VL1) with an Ethernet emulation layer somewhat similar to VXLAN (termed VL2). Our VL2 Ethernet virtualization layer includes advanced enterprise SDN features like fine grained access control rules for network micro-segmentation and security monitoring. All ZeroTier traffic is encrypted end-to-end using secret keys that only you control. Most traffic flows peer to peer, though we offer free (but slow) relaying for users who cannot establish peer to peer connections. The goals and design principles of ZeroTier are inspired by among other things the original Google BeyondCorp paper and the Jericho Forum with its notion of "deperimeterization." Fedora Account System Username: atim Working COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/zerotier-one/ Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 months

1
29
0 / 0

[Bug 5122] New: Review Request: omxplayer - Raspberry Pi command line OMX player

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5122 Bug ID: 5122 Summary: Review Request: omxplayer - Raspberry Pi command line OMX player Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: arm OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: zonexpertconsulting(a)outlook.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: rpi FAS account: kni WHY NOT FEDORA? --------------- This package needs ffmpeg, in addition to raspberrypi-vc. SPEC URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/knight-of-ni/specfiles/master/omxplayer... SRPM URL: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3453/283453/omxplayer-2018... DESCRIPTION ----------- OMXPlayer is a video player specifically made for the Raspberry Pi's GPU. It relies on the OpenMAX hardware acceleration API, which is the Broadcom's VideoCore officially supported API for GPU video/audio processing. NOTES ----- - I have removed the bundled ffmpeg requirement. The package builds against the ffmpeg package in the rpi namespace. - This package has no cmake or autotools. Just a Makefile. The Makefile must be altered for compatibility. My preference was to use sed to accomplish this, rather than patch files. I found it easier to manipulate the compiler flags this way as I was testing. - This is still a work in progress. I have not yet run the player, but I do want to start the peer review process to verify my work. PROVIDES --------- $ rpm -q --provides omxplayer-20181014-3.7f3faf6.fc29.armv7hl.rpm omxplayer = 20181014-3.7f3faf6.fc29 omxplayer(armv7hl-32) = 20181014-3.7f3faf6.fc29 REQUIRES -------- $ rpm -q --requires omxplayer-20181014-3.7f3faf6.fc29.armv7hl.rpm /usr/bin/bash fbset gnu-free-sans-fonts ld-linux-armhf.so.3 ld-linux-armhf.so.3(GLIBC_2.4) libasound.so.2 libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9) libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.0rc4) libavcodec.so.58 libavcodec.so.58(LIBAVCODEC_58) libavformat.so.58 libavformat.so.58(LIBAVFORMAT_58) libavutil.so.56 libavutil.so.56(LIBAVUTIL_56) libbcm_host.so libbrcmEGL.so libbrcmGLESv2.so libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.28) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.8) libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-1.so.3(LIBDBUS_1_3) libfreetype.so.6 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.5) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.27) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libopenmaxil.so libpcre.so.1 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.4) librt.so.1 librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.4) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_ARM_1.3.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.11) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.18) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.19) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.20) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.21) libswresample.so.3 libswresample.so.3(LIBSWRESAMPLE_3) libswscale.so.5 libvchiq_arm.so libvcos.so libz.so.1 omxplayer-libs(armv7hl-32) = 20181014-3.7f3faf6.fc29 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) RPMLINT -------- >omxplayer.src:80: W: macro-in-comment %{commit_date} >omxplayer.src:81: W: macro-in-comment %{commit_short} >omxplayer.src:83: W: macro-in-comment %{url} This is a false positive caused by the way the specfile generates version.h >omxplayer.armv7hl: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/omxplayer/COPYING PR sent upstream: https://github.com/popcornmix/omxplayer/pull/670 >omxplayer.armv7hl: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/omxplayer.1.gz I'm not how this mangpage ended up with execute bit set. Can look into this if asked to. >omxplayer.armv7hl: W: no-manual-page-for-binary omxplayer.bin False positve. omxplayer is a wrapper for omxplayer.bin. Thus, omxplayer.1 is the man page for this binary. >omxplayer-desktop.armv7hl: E: explicit-lib-dependency libnotify The desktop subpackage has libnotify as an installation requirement. I left it in due to historical reasons. I am not sure why it is there, but I can look into it if asked. >omxplayer-desktop.armv7hl: W: no-documentation This subpackage is nothing but a .desktop file. It doesn't need documentation. >omxplayer-desktop.armv7hl: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/omxplayer.desktop lxterminal The binary is in the base package. >3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 7 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 months, 2 weeks

2
15
0 / 0

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers February 2021