[Bug 2842] New: Review request: openssl-freeworld - Utilities from the general purpose cryptography library with TLS implementation
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842
Bug #: 2842
Summary: Review request: openssl-freeworld - Utilities from the
general purpose cryptography library with TLS
implementation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: jeffmendoza(a)live.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
http://jm-workhorse.cloudapp.net/rpmfusion/openssl-freeworld/openssl-free...
http://jm-workhorse.cloudapp.net/rpmfusion/openssl-freeworld/openssl-free...
This is the freeworld version of Fedora's openssl, which includes the EC
cipher.
The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between
machines. OpenSSL includes a certificate management tool and shared
libraries which provide various cryptographic algorithms and
protocols.
>From http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist
Request: OpenSSL with Elliptic Curve, IDEA, MDC-2, RC5 crypto algorithms
Summary: The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications
between machines.
URL: http://www.openssl.org/
Why not in Fedora: Because of the problem with software patents:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901
Notes: OpenSSL is included in Fedora but with Elliptic Curve, IDEA, MDC-2,
RC5 crypto algorithms disabled.
rpmlint:
srpm:
openssl-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic ->
cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic
openssl-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission make-dummy-cert 0755L
openssl-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission renew-dummy-cert 0755L
openssl-freeworld.src:159: W: macro-in-comment %patch40
openssl-freeworld.src:165: W: macro-in-comment %patch56
openssl-freeworld.src:166: W: macro-in-comment %patch58
openssl-freeworld.src:171: W: macro-in-comment %patch68
openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
openssl-freeworld.src:277: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
openssl-freeworld.src:278: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
openssl-freeworld.src:278: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
openssl-freeworld.src:278: W: macro-in-comment %{soversion}
openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
openssl-freeworld.src:279: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
openssl-freeworld.src:280: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
openssl-freeworld.src:280: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
openssl-freeworld.src:280: W: macro-in-comment %{soversion}
openssl-freeworld.src:415: W: macro-in-comment %attr
openssl-freeworld.src:415: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
openssl-freeworld.src:416: W: macro-in-comment %attr
openssl-freeworld.src:416: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
openssl-freeworld.src:196: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3,
tab: line 196)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 26 warnings.
The macro-in-comments are from commenting out lines from the original Fedora
spec.
The rest are from the original.
binary rpms:
openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic
-> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic
openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.1e-4
['1:1.0.1e-4.fc18', '1:1.0.1e-4']
openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/openssl
openssl-freeworld.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/pki/CA/private 0700L
openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/openssl-freeworld-1.0.1e/CHANGES
openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/tls/certs/Makefile
openssl-freeworld.x86_64: W: install-file-in-docs
/usr/share/doc/openssl-freeworld-1.0.1e/INSTALL
openssl-freeworld-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided openssl
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libgost.so
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libpadlock.so
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libubsec.so
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libchil.so
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libcapi.so
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libgmp.so
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libaep.so
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libsureware.so
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/libssl.so.1.0.1e
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/lib4758cca.so
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libcswift.so
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libatalla.so
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/engines/libnuron.so
openssl-freeworld-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/openssl-freeworld/libcrypto.so.1.0.1e
openssl-freeworld-perl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary c_rehash
openssl-freeworld-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic
openssl-freeworld-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 26 warnings.
This is all from the original. I don't know why the binaries aren't getting
stripped. I might try to clean some of this up, even if it means more changes
from the Fedora spec.
This is my first RPM Fusion package, and I'm seeking a sponsor. I'm not a
Fedora sponsored packager either.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
3 months
[Bug 5937] New: Review Request: welle-io - Receiver for DAB and DAB+
broadcast radio
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5937
Bug ID: 5937
Summary: Review Request: welle-io - Receiver for DAB and DAB+
broadcast radio
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: marcus_rpmfusion(a)hostalia.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: free
Spec:
https://pagure.io/fork/marcusmueller/fedora-welle-io/blob/master/f/welle-...
SRPM:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/marcusmueller/Welle.io/build/2024...
Description: Receive digital audio broadcasts with your computer: welle.io is
an open source DAB and DAB+ software defined radio (SDR) with direct support
for RTL-SDR and other SDR hardware through SoapySDR. It supports high DPI and
touch displays and it runs even on cheap computers.
This package is not eligible for inclusion in fedora, as it depends on faad2
(like the other DAB receiver software, gr-dab, that was reviewed for inclusion
in rpmfusion).
rpmlint srpm: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint rpm:
W: no-manual-page-for-binary welle-cli
W: no-manual-page-for-binary welle-io
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Explanation for ignored warnings: no upstream manpages, welle-io is a GUI
executable, and welle-cli a somewhat self-documenting HTTP serving frontend
This is my first rpmfusion package. I'm co-maint on fedora's verilator, and
have a package in the fedora review pipeline (signify).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
3 months
RPM Fusion update report 2021-08-30
by noreply＠rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 33
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Nestopia-1.51.1-1.fc33
mpd-0.22.11-1.fc33
xroar-0.37.1-1.fc33
Pushed to stable:
chromium-freeworld-92.0.4515.159-4.fc33
performous-2.0.0-0.8.20210814gite0a28a6.fc33
xroar-0.37-1.fc33
Fedora 34
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Nestopia-1.51.1-1.fc34
mpd-0.22.11-1.fc34
xroar-0.37.1-1.fc34
Pushed to stable:
chromium-freeworld-92.0.4515.159-4.fc34
performous-2.0.0-0.8.20210814gite0a28a6.fc34
xroar-0.37-1.fc34
Fedora 35
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Nestopia-1.51.1-1.fc35
mpd-0.22.11-1.fc35
xroar-0.37.1-1.fc35
Pushed to stable:
chromium-freeworld-92.0.4515.159-4.fc35
kdenlive-21.04.3-3.fc35
performous-2.0.0-0.8.20210814gite0a28a6.fc35
rpmfusion-free-release-35-0.2
xpra-codecs-freeworld-4.2.2-1.fc35
xroar-0.37-1.fc35
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
mpd-0.22.11-1.el8
Pushed to stable:
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 33
-------------
Pushed to testing:
steam-1.0.0.71-4.fc33
Pushed to stable:
steam-1.0.0.71-3.fc33
Fedora 34
-------------
Pushed to testing:
steam-1.0.0.71-4.fc34
Pushed to stable:
steam-1.0.0.71-3.fc34
Fedora 35
-------------
Pushed to testing:
steam-1.0.0.71-4.fc35
Pushed to stable:
rpmfusion-nonfree-release-35-0.2
steam-1.0.0.71-3.fc35
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
5 months
RPM Fusion update report 2021-08-26
by noreply＠rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 33
-------------
Pushed to testing:
chromium-freeworld-92.0.4515.159-4.fc33
performous-2.0.0-0.8.20210814gite0a28a6.fc33
xroar-0.37-1.fc33
Pushed to stable:
mock-rpmfusion-free-35.0-1.fc33
smplayer-21.8.0-2.fc33
smtube-21.7.0-1.fc33
vdr-markad-3.0.10-1.fc33
Fedora 34
-------------
Pushed to testing:
chromium-freeworld-92.0.4515.159-4.fc34
performous-2.0.0-0.8.20210814gite0a28a6.fc34
xroar-0.37-1.fc34
Pushed to stable:
mock-rpmfusion-free-35.0-1.fc34
smplayer-21.8.0-2.fc34
smtube-21.7.0-1.fc34
vdr-markad-3.0.10-1.fc34
Fedora 35
-------------
Pushed to testing:
chromium-freeworld-92.0.4515.159-4.fc35
kdenlive-21.04.3-3.fc35
performous-2.0.0-0.8.20210814gite0a28a6.fc35
xpra-codecs-freeworld-4.2.2-1.fc35
xroar-0.37-1.fc35
Pushed to stable:
aegisub-3.2.2-24.20191006.git6f54695.fc35
mock-rpmfusion-free-35.0-1.fc35
mp3diags-1.2.03-15.fc35
mpv-0.33.1-3.fc35
rpmfusion-free-release-35-0.2
smc-1.9-31.fc35
smplayer-21.8.0-2.fc35
smtube-21.7.0-1.fc35
vdr-markad-3.0.10-1.fc35
vlc-3.0.16-5.fc35
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
mock-rpmfusion-free-35.0-1.el7
smplayer-21.8.0-2.el7
smtube-21.7.0-1.el7
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
mock-rpmfusion-free-35.0-1.el8
smplayer-21.8.0-2.el8
smtube-21.7.0-1.el8
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 33
-------------
Pushed to testing:
steam-1.0.0.71-3.fc33
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470.63.01-3.fc33
Pushed to stable:
mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-35.0-1.fc33
Fedora 34
-------------
Pushed to testing:
steam-1.0.0.71-3.fc34
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470.63.01-3.fc34
Pushed to stable:
mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-35.0-1.fc34
Fedora 35
-------------
Pushed to testing:
steam-1.0.0.71-3.fc35
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470.63.01-3.fc35
Pushed to stable:
frogatto-1.3.3-22.fc35
mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-35.0-1.fc35
rpmfusion-nonfree-release-35-0.2
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-35.0-1.el7
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-35.0-1.el8
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
5 months
nvidia power management
by Julian Sikorski
Hello,
I have recently experienced a resume failure with nvidia [1]. Upon
deeper investigation, it turns out that PreserveVideoMemoryAllocations
was enabled recently [2]. According to documentation [3] and to Arch
Wiki [4], for this option to work, nvidia systemd units need to be
enabled (nvidia-resume is not recommended by Arch). They are not on my
machine:
$ sudo systemctl status nvidia-suspend.service nvidia-resume.service
nvidia-hibernate.service
[sudo] hasło użytkownika julas:
○ nvidia-suspend.service - NVIDIA system suspend actions
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/nvidia-suspend.service;
disabled; vendor preset: disabled)
Active: inactive (dead)
○ nvidia-resume.service - NVIDIA system resume actions
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/nvidia-resume.service;
disabled; vendor preset: disabled)
Active: inactive (dead)
○ nvidia-hibernate.service - NVIDIA system hibernate actions
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/nvidia-hibernate.service;
disabled; vendor preset: disabled)
Active: inactive (dead)
I am not sure what Fedora's policy on enabling systemd units by default
is, but it appears like either the systemd units need to be enabled or
PreserveVideoMemoryAllocations should be rolled back. With
nvidia-suspend and nvidia-hibernate enabled, my machine does suspend
correctly again. With nvidia-resume enabled, it also does resume
properly. Without it, machine resumes but the screen does not re-activate.
Best regards,
Julian
[1]
https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/occassional-failure-to-resume-pci-p...
[2]
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia.git/commit/?i...
[3]
http://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/470.63.01/README/powerman...
[4]
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/NVIDIA/Tips_and_tricks#Preserve_video_me...
5 months, 1 week