December 2022 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 6468] New: Review request: intel-ipu6-kmod-common - The necessary module configuration for akmod-intel-ipu6

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6468 Bug ID: 6468 Summary: Review request: intel-ipu6-kmod-common - The necessary module configuration for akmod-intel-ipu6 Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: hpa(a)redhat.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree - Full URLs to the spec file and source rpm of the package. https://github.com/smallorange/intel-ipu6 - A short description for the package (usually, the %description from the spec file). This provides the module loading configurations for Intel IPU6 MIPI camera solutions. - Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora. The driver is published by Intel and it has not yet merged into the kernel upstream. Also, it contains several proprietary binaries to drive both sensors and IPU. - The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for each message why you've chosen to ignore it. rpmlint result looks good. - Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package. This is my first RPM fusion package :) - Mention that you are seeking a sponsor if you are not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. Yes, I'm seeking a reviewer. Reference: https://github.com/intel/ipu6-drivers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 hours, 44 minutes

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 6534] New: Review request: icamerasrc - GStreamer plugin for Intel IPU6

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6534 Bug ID: 6534 Summary: Review request: icamerasrc - GStreamer plugin for Intel IPU6 Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: hpa(a)redhat.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree SPEC:https://github.com/smallorange/intel-icamerasrc/raw/main/icamerasrc.... SRPM:https://github.com/smallorange/intel-icamerasrc/releases/download/0.... Summary: GStreamer plugin for Intel IPU6 Description: This package provides the GStreamer plugin for MIPI camera solution. Rpmfusion Account System Username: smallorange - Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora. GStreamer is a part of Intel's proprietary MIPI camera solution. Finally, the rpmlint results looked good but "incorrect-fsf-address" was reported. The source owner should fix this license issue. Thank you:) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 day, 14 hours

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 6508] New: Review request: ipu6-camera-hal - Hardware abstraction layer for Intel IPU6

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6508 Bug ID: 6508 Summary: Review request: ipu6-camera-hal - Hardware abstraction layer for Intel IPU6 Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: hpa(a)redhat.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree Created attachment 2445 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=2445&action=edit rpmlin result SPEC: https://github.com/smallorange/intel-ipu6-camera-hal/blob/main/intel-ipu6... SRPM: https://github.com/smallorange/intel-ipu6-camera-hal/releases/download/0.... Description: ipu6-camera-hal provides the basic hardware access APIs for IPU6. Also, the subpackage- ipu6-camera-hal-devel provides the header files for the IPU6 device access development. Rpmfusion Account System Username: smallorange - Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora. HAL is a part of Intel's proprietary MIPI camera solution. - The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for each message why you've chosen to ignore it. rpmlint looks good and the detail can be found in the attachment. - Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package. Yes - Mention that you are seeking a sponsor if you are not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. No -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 days, 17 hours

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 6387] New: Review request: kodi-inputstream-ffmpegdirect - inputstream.ffmpegdirect for Kodi

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6387 Bug ID: 6387 Summary: Review request: kodi-inputstream-ffmpegdirect - inputstream.ffmpegdirect for Kodi Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: avibrazil(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 namespace: free Based on https://github.com/xbmc/inputstream.ffmpegdirect. I used other RPMFusion's Kodi addon spec files as a basis to make this. SPEC: https://github.com/avibrazil/kodi-inputstream-ffmpegdirect/blob/main/kodi... RPMS: https://github.com/avibrazil/kodi-inputstream-ffmpegdirect/releases Please review and approve Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 week, 1 day

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 6426] New: Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 Bug ID: 6426 Summary: Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free SPEC: https://www.thefinalzone.net/packages/mesa-freeworld.spec SRPM: https://www.thefinalzone.net/packages/mesa-freeworld-22.2.0-1.fc37.src.rpm Description: Mesa graphics libraries supporting vaapi for AMD hardware This file include vaapi libraries used by AMD hardware excluded from the Fedora repository due to patents concern. See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o... rpmlint mesa-freeworld-22.2.0-1.fc37.src.rpm hide =================================== rpmlint session starts =================================== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 mesa-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission mesa-freeworld.spec 600 rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-36-x86_64/result/mesa-vaapi-drivers-freeworld-22.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm =================================== rpmlint session starts =================================== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 mesa-vaapi-drivers-freeworld.x86_64: W: no-documentation rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-36-x86_64/result/mesa-filesystem-freeworld-22.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm =================================== rpmlint session starts =================================== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 ==== 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s ==== rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-36-x86_64/result/mesa-freeworld-22.2.0-1.fc36.src.rpm =================================== rpmlint session starts =================================== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 mesa-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission mesa-freeworld.spec 600 ==== 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s == -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 week, 3 days

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 6505] New: Review request: nautilus-dropbox - Dropbox extension for Nautilus

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6505 Bug ID: 6505 Summary: Review request: nautilus-dropbox - Dropbox extension for Nautilus Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: belegdol(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree SRPM URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/6zmwxw2r0pczmek/nautilus-dropbox-2020.03.04-7.f... Spec URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/i37u0tpv648s2e8/nautilus-dropbox.spec?dl=0 Description: Dropbox extension for nautilus file manager This review is supposed to revive the dead nautilus-dropbox package. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint nautilus-dropbox.spec =============================================================================================== rpmlint session starts ============================================================================================== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 ================================================================ 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s =============================================================== $ rpmlint nautilus-dropbox-2020.03.04-7.fc38.src.rpm =============================================================================================== rpmlint session starts ============================================================================================== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 ================================================================ 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s =============================================================== $ rpmlint /mnt/openmediavault/kernel/results/fedora-37-x86_64/nautilus-dropbox-2020.03.04-7.fc38/ =============================================================================================== rpmlint session starts ============================================================================================== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 nautilus-dropbox-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/nautilus/extensions-4/libnautilus-dropbox.so-2020.03.04-7.fc37.x86_64.debug nautilus-dropbox-debuginfo.x86_64: E: shared-library-without-dependency-information /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/nautilus/extensions-4/libnautilus-dropbox.so-2020.03.04-7.fc37.x86_64.debug nautilus-dropbox.x86_64: W: no-documentation nautilus-dropbox-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-documentation nautilus-dropbox-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation dropbox.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libatomic nautilus-dropbox-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/1b/239458303a8c5cba294e03ff87fde2d3156195 ../../../.build-id/1b/239458303a8c5cba294e03ff87fde2d3156195 ================================================================ 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings, 2 badness; has taken 0.8 s =============================================================== -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

2 weeks

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 6474] New: Review request: ipu6-bin and ipu6-bin-firmware - Intel IPU6/iVSC binary library and firmware

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6474 Bug ID: 6474 Summary: Review request: ipu6-bin and ipu6-bin-firmware - Intel IPU6/iVSC binary library and firmware Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: hpa(a)redhat.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree - Full URLs to the spec file and source rpm of the package. https://github.com/smallorange/ipu6-bin-firmware - A short description for the package (usually, the %description from the spec file). This rpm spec contains two packages. They are ipu6-bin and ipu6-firmware. ipu6-bin is used to: This provides the necessary binaries for Intel IPU6, including IPU6 itself and iVSC. The library includes necessary image processing algorithms and 3A algorithm for the camera. ipu6-bin-firmware is used to: This provides the necessary firmwares for Intel IPU6, including IPU6 and iVSC. - Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora. These are Intel proprietary binary releases. - The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for each message why you've chosen to ignore it. rpmlint look good. - Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package. Yes - Mention that you are seeking a sponsor if you are not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. Yes, I'm seeking a reviewer. Reference: https://github.com/intel/ipu6-camera-bins -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

2 weeks, 5 days

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 6529] New: Review request: v4l2-relay- Utils for relaying Gstreamer source to any other Gstreamer source.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6529 Bug ID: 6529 Summary: Review request: v4l2-relay- Utils for relaying Gstreamer source to any other Gstreamer source. Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: hpa(a)redhat.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free SPEC: https://github.com/smallorange/v4l2-relay/raw/main/v4l2-relayd.spec SRPM: https://github.com/smallorange/v4l2-relay/releases/download/0.1.2-1/v4l2-... Description: This is used to relay the input Gstreamer source to an output Gstreamer source. Also, this is the necessary part for the MIPI camara solution. Which can relay the image source from MIPI camera to v4l2loopback. rpmlint result: The lint result looks good. Only the warning is about the lack of documents and manuals since the author didn't provide the documents. Thank you :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

3 weeks, 5 days

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 5164] New: Review request: Stansoft - A text-based financial accounting system

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5164 Bug ID: 5164 Summary: Review request: Stansoft - A text-based financial accounting system Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: rpm(a)stansoft.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 namespace: free http://download.stansoft.org/files/stansoft.spec http://download.stansoft.org/files/stansoft-7.15-1.fc29.src.rpm Stansoft is a Linux, text-based, double-entry financial accounting system. It includes payroll for both the U.S. and UK PAYE RTI. This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it is not open source. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 month

1
38
0 / 0

[Bug 5787] New: Review Request: libmysofa - C functions for reading HRTFs

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5787 Bug ID: 5787 Summary: Review Request: libmysofa - C functions for reading HRTFs Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: rpi SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/gl4es-1.1.2-4.20201007git3259c93.fc31.src.rpm SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/gl4es.spec Summary: OpenGL to GL ES translation library This package is a version for the rpi namespace I expect this package to be useful along with a proprietary driver that lacks libGL implementation (only has gles or egl like rpi). I plan to (automatically) build a rpi agnostic version in a copr repository. (and not on rpmfusion-free or nonfree because it's unknown which gles implementation to target). It's still a question whether this is useful given rpi can use either upstream driver (with upstream kernel) or downstream driver (using kernel-rpi). But if using the raspberrypi-vc userspace, a particular having a libGL would be usefull given it's an assumption by the fedora userspace. I don't plan to exclude the libGL to avoid dependency computation error given that for the rpi namespace Koji scratch build for f33: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=440257 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 month

1
7
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers December 2022