[Bug 6468] New: Review request: intel-ipu6-kmod-common - The
necessary module configuration for akmod-intel-ipu6
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6468
Bug ID: 6468
Summary: Review request: intel-ipu6-kmod-common - The necessary
module configuration for akmod-intel-ipu6
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: All
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: hpa(a)redhat.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: nonfree
- Full URLs to the spec file and source rpm of the package.
https://github.com/smallorange/intel-ipu6
- A short description for the package (usually, the %description from the spec
file).
This provides the module loading configurations for Intel IPU6 MIPI camera
solutions.
- Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora.
The driver is published by Intel and it has not yet merged into the kernel
upstream. Also, it contains several proprietary binaries to drive both sensors
and IPU.
- The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for
each message why you've chosen to ignore it.
rpmlint result looks good.
- Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package.
This is my first RPM fusion package :)
- Mention that you are seeking a sponsor if you are not a Fedora sponsored
packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager.
Yes, I'm seeking a reviewer.
Reference:
https://github.com/intel/ipu6-drivers
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
11 hours, 44 minutes
[Bug 6426] New: Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics
libraries
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
Bug ID: 6426
Summary: Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics
libraries
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: free
SPEC: https://www.thefinalzone.net/packages/mesa-freeworld.spec
SRPM:
https://www.thefinalzone.net/packages/mesa-freeworld-22.2.0-1.fc37.src.rpm
Description: Mesa graphics libraries supporting vaapi for AMD hardware
This file include vaapi libraries used by AMD hardware excluded from the Fedora
repository due to patents concern. See
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
rpmlint mesa-freeworld-22.2.0-1.fc37.src.rpm hide
=================================== rpmlint session starts
===================================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1
mesa-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission mesa-freeworld.spec 600
rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-36-x86_64/result/mesa-vaapi-drivers-freeworld-22.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
=================================== rpmlint session starts
===================================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1
mesa-vaapi-drivers-freeworld.x86_64: W: no-documentation
rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-36-x86_64/result/mesa-filesystem-freeworld-22.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
=================================== rpmlint session starts
===================================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1
==== 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has
taken 0.0 s ====
rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-36-x86_64/result/mesa-freeworld-22.2.0-1.fc36.src.rpm
=================================== rpmlint session starts
===================================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1
mesa-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission mesa-freeworld.spec 600
==== 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness; has
taken 0.2 s ==
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 week, 3 days
[Bug 6505] New: Review request: nautilus-dropbox - Dropbox extension for Nautilus
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6505
Bug ID: 6505
Summary: Review request: nautilus-dropbox - Dropbox extension
for Nautilus
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: belegdol(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: nonfree
SRPM URL:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6zmwxw2r0pczmek/nautilus-dropbox-2020.03.04-7.f...
Spec URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/i37u0tpv648s2e8/nautilus-dropbox.spec?dl=0
Description:
Dropbox extension for nautilus file manager
This review is supposed to revive the dead nautilus-dropbox package.
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint nautilus-dropbox.spec
===============================================================================================
rpmlint session starts
==============================================================================================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1
================================================================ 0 packages and
1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s
===============================================================
$ rpmlint nautilus-dropbox-2020.03.04-7.fc38.src.rpm
===============================================================================================
rpmlint session starts
==============================================================================================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1
================================================================ 1 packages and
0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s
===============================================================
$ rpmlint
/mnt/openmediavault/kernel/results/fedora-37-x86_64/nautilus-dropbox-2020.03.04-7.fc38/
===============================================================================================
rpmlint session starts
==============================================================================================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1
nautilus-dropbox-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/nautilus/extensions-4/libnautilus-dropbox.so-2020.03.04-7.fc37.x86_64.debug
nautilus-dropbox-debuginfo.x86_64: E:
shared-library-without-dependency-information
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/nautilus/extensions-4/libnautilus-dropbox.so-2020.03.04-7.fc37.x86_64.debug
nautilus-dropbox.x86_64: W: no-documentation
nautilus-dropbox-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-documentation
nautilus-dropbox-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
dropbox.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libatomic
nautilus-dropbox-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/1b/239458303a8c5cba294e03ff87fde2d3156195
../../../.build-id/1b/239458303a8c5cba294e03ff87fde2d3156195
================================================================ 5 packages and
0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings, 2 badness; has taken 0.8 s
===============================================================
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
2 weeks
[Bug 6474] New: Review request: ipu6-bin and ipu6-bin-firmware -
Intel IPU6/iVSC binary library and firmware
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6474
Bug ID: 6474
Summary: Review request: ipu6-bin and ipu6-bin-firmware - Intel
IPU6/iVSC binary library and firmware
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: All
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: hpa(a)redhat.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: nonfree
- Full URLs to the spec file and source rpm of the package.
https://github.com/smallorange/ipu6-bin-firmware
- A short description for the package (usually, the %description from the spec
file).
This rpm spec contains two packages. They are ipu6-bin and ipu6-firmware.
ipu6-bin is used to:
This provides the necessary binaries for Intel IPU6, including IPU6 itself
and iVSC. The library includes necessary image processing algorithms and
3A algorithm for the camera.
ipu6-bin-firmware is used to:
This provides the necessary firmwares for Intel IPU6, including IPU6 and iVSC.
- Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora.
These are Intel proprietary binary releases.
- The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for
each message why you've chosen to ignore it.
rpmlint look good.
- Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package.
Yes
- Mention that you are seeking a sponsor if you are not a Fedora sponsored
packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager.
Yes, I'm seeking a reviewer.
Reference:
https://github.com/intel/ipu6-camera-bins
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
2 weeks, 5 days
[Bug 5787] New: Review Request: libmysofa - C functions for reading
HRTFs
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5787
Bug ID: 5787
Summary: Review Request: libmysofa - C functions for reading
HRTFs
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Group: Package Reviews
namespace: rpi
SRPM:
http://dl.kwizart.net/review/gl4es-1.1.2-4.20201007git3259c93.fc31.src.rpm
SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/gl4es.spec
Summary: OpenGL to GL ES translation library
This package is a version for the rpi namespace
I expect this package to be useful along with a proprietary driver that lacks
libGL implementation (only has gles or egl like rpi).
I plan to (automatically) build a rpi agnostic version in a copr repository.
(and not on rpmfusion-free or nonfree because it's unknown which gles
implementation to target).
It's still a question whether this is useful given rpi can use either upstream
driver (with upstream kernel) or downstream driver (using kernel-rpi). But if
using the raspberrypi-vc userspace, a particular having a libGL would be
usefull given it's an assumption by the fedora userspace.
I don't plan to exclude the libGL to avoid dependency computation error given
that for the rpi namespace
Koji scratch build for f33:
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=440257
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 month