September 2022 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 5164] New: Review request: Stansoft - A text-based financial accounting system

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5164 Bug ID: 5164 Summary: Review request: Stansoft - A text-based financial accounting system Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: rpm(a)stansoft.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 namespace: free http://download.stansoft.org/files/stansoft.spec http://download.stansoft.org/files/stansoft-7.15-1.fc29.src.rpm Stansoft is a Linux, text-based, double-entry financial accounting system. It includes payroll for both the U.S. and UK PAYE RTI. This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it is not open source. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

3 weeks, 1 day

1
38
0 / 0

[Bug 5787] New: Review Request: libmysofa - C functions for reading HRTFs

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5787 Bug ID: 5787 Summary: Review Request: libmysofa - C functions for reading HRTFs Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: rpi SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/gl4es-1.1.2-4.20201007git3259c93.fc31.src.rpm SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/gl4es.spec Summary: OpenGL to GL ES translation library This package is a version for the rpi namespace I expect this package to be useful along with a proprietary driver that lacks libGL implementation (only has gles or egl like rpi). I plan to (automatically) build a rpi agnostic version in a copr repository. (and not on rpmfusion-free or nonfree because it's unknown which gles implementation to target). It's still a question whether this is useful given rpi can use either upstream driver (with upstream kernel) or downstream driver (using kernel-rpi). But if using the raspberrypi-vc userspace, a particular having a libGL would be usefull given it's an assumption by the fedora userspace. I don't plan to exclude the libGL to avoid dependency computation error given that for the rpi namespace Koji scratch build for f33: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=440257 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

3 weeks, 2 days

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 6367] New: Update Nvidia driver to version 515 for RHEL8.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6367 Bug ID: 6367 Summary: Update Nvidia driver to version 515 for RHEL8. Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: hmfhgzwcddhsxjfdzw(a)nthrw.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree The current version in RPMFusion of Nvidia Driver for RHEL8-based system is 510, I just want to make sure if version 515 will be available for RHEL8 in the future. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

3 weeks, 2 days

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 6383] New: Review request: kodi-imagedecoder-heif - HEIF/HEIC image support for Kodi

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6383 Bug ID: 6383 Summary: Review request: kodi-imagedecoder-heif - HEIF/HEIC image support for Kodi Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: avibrazil(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free Easily built using other RPMFusion's kodi spec files as template. Proven to work with vanilla Kodi 19 from RPMFusion (after a simple Kodi restart). This package is essential for iPhone and Mac users that store their photos on Fedora servers and use Kodi to browse and display them. HEIF/HEIC is a new image and photo format much more efficient and flexible than old JPEG. This should build out of the box on newer Kodi/Fedora too with minor obvious tweaks to SPEC file. Please approve and include in RPMFusion for easy installation. Thank you in advance. SPEC: https://github.com/avibrazil/kodi-imagedecoder-heif SRPM: https://github.com/avibrazil/kodi-imagedecoder-heif/releases/tag/19.0.0 Output of "rpmlint SRPMS/kodi-imagedecoder-heif-19.0.0-1.fc36.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/kodi-imagedecoder-heif-19.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm": 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 month, 3 weeks

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 6396] New: Review request: man-pages-posix - POSIX interface documentation

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6396 Bug ID: 6396 Summary: Review request: man-pages-posix - POSIX interface documentation Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: fedora(a)sicherha.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree URLs ---- https://www4.cs.fau.de/~erhardt/foo/man-pages-posix/man-pages-posix.spec https://www4.cs.fau.de/~erhardt/foo/man-pages-posix/man-pages-posix-2017a... Description ----------- A collection of POSIX manual pages from the Linux Documentation Project (LDP). Background ---------- As of August 2022, the POSIX man pages are no longer included in Fedora's `man-pages` package because of licensing concerns. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116859 for more information. rpmlint output -------------- $ rpmlint man-pages-posix-2017a-1.fc36.src.rpm ====================================== rpmlint session starts ====================================== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 ======= 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s ======= $ rpmlint man-pages-posix-2017a-1.fc36.noarch.rpm ====================================== rpmlint session starts ====================================== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 man-pages-posix.noarch: W: package-with-huge-docs: 100% ======= 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.4 s ======= Unsurprisingly, this package consists of 100 % documentation, so I feel the 'package-with-huge-docs' warning can be safely ignored. Author information ------------------ This is my first RPM Fusion package; I am not yet a member of the packagers group. I do, however, officially maintain a small number of packages in the Fedora project; namely mold, powerline and python-jenkins-job-builder. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

2 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 5824] New: Review request: etlegacy - Fully compatible client and server for the popular online FPS game Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824 Bug ID: 5824 Summary: Review request: etlegacy - Fully compatible client and server for the popular online FPS game Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 URL: https://www.etlegacy.com/about OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: pemensik(a)redhat.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 namespace: free SPEC URL: https://github.com/pemensik/etlegacy/raw/fedora/etlegacy.spec SRPM URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/srpm/etlegacy-2.76-1.20201026git1ee8c7e... Client is released under GPL, but it still requires original pk3 data, obtained from [2] package. That data are covered by EULA, forbidding commercial use. 1. https://www.etlegacy.com/about 2. https://www.splashdamage.com/games/wolfenstein-enemy-territory/ Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

2 months, 2 weeks

1
12
0 / 0

Final f37 freeze in about one week

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hi there, According to schedule, the f37 is in the 4th of October: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-37/f-37-key-tasks.html There is a need to sort out which "feature" we want to have in our GA repository, basically: - Package that need to be removed (Leigh has removed some) - Adapt comps - others ? (please state). On my side I want to rework the ffmpeg package to get back to normal (so conflicts with fedora will be restored) and only drop a libavcodec freeworld replacement in an additional dedicated sub-package (with ldconfig override) to complement the fedora counterpart. It means the best of two worlds: - Having our ffmpeg build to be fully autonomous. Do not require small pieces of fedora ffmpeg, and don't wait for counterpart updates, which have been "dramatic" in the past, specially with chromium. - It will also provide a means to complement the fedora ffmpeg-free one from the same package (and to not require a dedicated build, maintenance). Of course, I persist in the statement from Common_Bugs https://rpmfusion.org/CommonBugs#FFmpeg-free%20conflicts So I don't want to be involved in bugs that would occur in the fedora/original/counterpart/complement packaging myself. But I'm open to review/ease anyone willing to maintain this solution. This also opens the discussion for a mesa-freeworld solution. As I have provided various hints to do so in different places (like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123998 ). Beyond that I hope Fedora 37 will be a good release! -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

2 months, 3 weeks

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 6387] New: Review request: kodi-inputstream-ffmpegdirect - inputstream.ffmpegdirect for Kodi

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6387 Bug ID: 6387 Summary: Review request: kodi-inputstream-ffmpegdirect - inputstream.ffmpegdirect for Kodi Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: avibrazil(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 namespace: free Based on https://github.com/xbmc/inputstream.ffmpegdirect. I used other RPMFusion's Kodi addon spec files as a basis to make this. SPEC: https://github.com/avibrazil/kodi-inputstream-ffmpegdirect/blob/main/kodi... RPMS: https://github.com/avibrazil/kodi-inputstream-ffmpegdirect/releases Please review and approve Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Vulkan beta nvidia driver

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hi there, I've just started a dedicated vulkan-beta branch into our git repository to have a means to provide the driver. It's still hacky, so I have provided the driver in a separate place until this can be sorted out... Here is a quick howto: curl -O https://dl.kwizart.net/pub/vulkan-beta/vulkan-beta-nvidia-driver.repo --output-dir /etc/yum.repos. dnf update --disablerepo=rpmfusion-nonfree-updates,rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver-rawhide,cuda-fedora35-x86_64,copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:kwizart:nvidia-driver-rawhide --nogpgcheck rpm -qa \*nvidia\* >> /etc/dnf/plugins/versionlock.list Hope this helps -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

3 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

RPM Fusion update report 2022-09-30

by noreply＠rpmfusion.org

RPM Fusion update report ------------------------ Section free: ------------- Fedora 35 ------------- Pushed to testing: ffmpegthumbs-22.08.1-1.fc35 vdr-markad-3.0.26-1.fc35 Pushed to stable: mock-rpmfusion-free-37.0-1.fc35 Fedora 36 ------------- Pushed to testing: ffmpegthumbs-22.08.1-1.fc36 kdenlive-22.08.1-1.fc36 ppsspp-1.13.2-1.fc36 shotcut-22.09.23-1.fc36 tg_owt-0-26.20220508git10d5f4b.fc36 vdr-markad-3.0.26-1.fc36 Pushed to stable: audacity-freeworld-3.2.0-1.fc36 mlt-freeworld-7.8.0-1.fc36 mock-rpmfusion-free-37.0-1.fc36 Fedora 37 ------------- Pushed to testing: chromium-freeworld-106.0.5249.61-2.fc37 ffmpeg-5.1.2-1.fc37 ffmpegthumbs-22.08.1-1.fc37 kdenlive-22.08.1-1.fc37 ppsspp-1.13.2-1.fc37 shotcut-22.09.23-1.fc37 tg_owt-0-26.20220508git10d5f4b.fc37 vdr-markad-3.0.26-1.fc37 vlc-3.0.18-0.3.rc.fc37 Pushed to stable: audacity-freeworld-3.2.0-1.fc37 mock-rpmfusion-free-37.0-1.fc37 EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: mock-rpmfusion-free-37.0-1.el7 EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: mock-rpmfusion-free-37.0-1.el8 EL 9 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Section nonfree: ------------- Fedora 35 ------------- Pushed to testing: megasync-4.7.0.0-1.fc35 Pushed to stable: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-37.0-1.fc35 Fedora 36 ------------- Pushed to testing: megasync-4.7.0.0-1.fc36 nvidia-kmod-515.49.18-1.fc36 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-515.49.18-1.fc36 Pushed to stable: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-37.0-1.fc36 Fedora 37 ------------- Pushed to testing: megasync-4.7.0.0-1.fc37 nvidia-kmod-515.76-2.fc37 nvidia-modprobe-515.76-2.fc37 nvidia-persistenced-515.76-2.fc37 nvidia-settings-515.76-2.fc37 nvidia-xconfig-515.76-2.fc37 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-515.76-2.fc37 Pushed to stable: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-37.0-1.fc37 rpmfusion-nonfree-obsolete-packages-37-3.fc37 EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-37.0-1.el7 EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-37.0-1.el8 EL 9 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org

3 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers September 2022