2013/3/18 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com>
2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski <belegdol@gmail.com>
W dniu 18.03.2013 21:16, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> 2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski
> <belegdol@gmail.com
> <mailto:belegdol@gmail.com>>
>
>     Dear all,
>
>     ffmpeg-1.2 was released recently. I have run a round of dep rebuilds and
>     the only packages that failed to rebuild were bino, lightspark and
>     dvbcut. None of these failures point directly to ffmpeg though.
>     I'd opt for pushing this into devel and F-19 ASAP, and then maybe even
>     to F-18 - but that one should be carefully considered.
>     rpmsodiff output is attached.
>
> devel is rawhide aka fedora-20 right now,  Any update must pass rawhide
> usability tests before anything else.
> As always I would like to have a sum-up of the ABI changes involved if any.
>
> I'm not fundamentally against having ffmpeg-1.2 in branched/F-19 at a
> later point. I just know some later ffmpeg update was locked by vlc
> because they will build but the rework needed to make it run will be
> done in the next vlc, not vlc bugfix.
>
> Nicolas (kwizart)
>
> Ps: I also don't have seen much mplayer update recently
>
>
>
>
As you can see from the rpmsodiff output, only one symbol was removed.
I should apologize, I've miss to see the rpmdiff output was attached in the first message.
So the rpmsodiff looks more safe than I expected.
There is a need to know the reason from this symbol removal, but this should be better to expect to F-19 soon, indeed.

That been said, there are still pending FTBFS from the F-19 mass rebuild, and some of theses are related to ffmpeg API. So unless there is a newer version compatible with current ffmpeg, it would like them to be moved to ffmpeg-compat (motion failed to catch it despite my attempt).

Nicolas (kwizart)