-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 12/24/2015 12:32 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qua, 2015-12-23 at 22:20 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 12/23/2015 09:51 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> 2015-12-22 20:31 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande
>> <anto.trande(a)gmail.com <mailto:anto.trande@gmail.com>>:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> these libraries (and others probably) are not available yet on
>> Fedora 22 and devel branch. Please, require a rebuild
>> (
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3821) as soon
>> as possible:
>>
>> faad2 libmpeg2 libdca twolame
>>
>>
>> All of them are actually available, please double check your
>> system.
>>
>> Nicolas (kwizart)
>>
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> are available as fc23 packages?
no , they are available as fc22 in F23
Honestly, I don't understand how we can tolerate something like that,
that is using on Fedora 23 some packages built on Fedora 22; is there
not any dependency issue?
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x565E653C
Check on
https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWe8KdAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8oJMH/RwTV31K5HhtXZ+4vgFT4lsA
AMpIxh0irWE1RiQyo8dvT1mRxSe2CoLBRZD/lPje52zqPTZD3AGIjNfRkhfdV/JO
9ATkoaRuEwdBE2WYjugZwtDrtF/KPgQy5bZSbZYruxAXKYbkepE3Y4JFLQ5TW5TL
Vz21Ef8EVvq3rIdmRAj9glVKYkGU1pd+zuxQg+7edM3t6l56WxGSXQm48O8MVVVy
xebHI2XHizRrBQsBkQvcY0PySmrA1rleXD5GiPL7+o20Co2cOHOlCn38fNbBre45
Nhaz1IrAx4ynSetmR2y92Zn3gIGFT/8DrzddSWcg0ssnGVybqK7Y/1wuH/rxM4A=
=ptLS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----