>>> I elected to have openssl-freeworld and
openssl-freeworld-devel
>>> conflict with the regular packages. openssl-freeworld has the binary
>>> openssl, this is not really needed, as the change is in the lib, and
>>> the regular openssl binary will work with openssl-freeworld-libs.
>>> openssl-freeworld-devel will conflict by installing the header files
>>> in the usual place. I had to modify the pkg-config files in the devel
>>> package to point to the new lib location.
>>
>> Sorry, just wanting some clarification. Can the regular openssl binary
>> use the freeworld functions of openssl-freeworld-libs? If so, wouldn't
>> it make more sense to just not bother building openssl-freeworld and
>> only provide openssl-freeworld-libs?
>
> Same question for openssl-freeworld-devel, could we get away with not
> creating that one too?
>
> -- Rex
Nope, the regular openssl-devel does not have the headers for the excluded algorithms.
Also, the pkg-config files have been updated to point to the new locations of the libs.
-Jeff
I had a chance to create the package review:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842
Looking for a sponser =)
Thanks,
Jeff