Re: How to test RPM Fusion

On 30.09.2008 01:37, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >> Add-on: We have no fully configured bug tracker yet for RPM Fusion. As >> such: please do *not* further distribute or link to above mail in Blogs, >> Forums or other Mailing lists for now. We'll announce a official testing >> phase for RPM Fusion once we have the important bits in place. tia! > > Is it useful to do a new compose of the live cd by replacing Livna > development with RPMFusion development repository? Please note that the compx.xml file is still in a flux and might complicate things a bit for you (e.g. you might need to adjust things again later); details in this thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-September/msg02615... Not to mention that a whole lot of packages are not in any groups right now. But all of that likely is not a big problem. > I got precious little feedback but a lot of downloads on the last compose > so I would like to hear more opinions. Sorry, but I mostly ignored the whole spins discussions up to now :-/ I consider getting rpmfusion running way more important for now, that's why I focus on that right now; and the long discussion around a rpmfusion spin happened when I was on vacation. :-( Hence my questions maybe might have been answered already, but - where does the name omeaga come from? - will omega become the official RPM Fusion spin or just serve as base for one? - seems there are other people/groups/projects that have spins based on livna already; have any attempts been made to get all of them together at one table within the RPM Fusion project to bundle efforts? Please don't take those questions as offense -- I like the idea with the spin. I just want to understand the long term goals and plans better.