Bug ID 4700
Summary Review request: bitwig-studio - A dynamic software for creation and performance of musical ideas
Product Package Reviews
Version Current
Hardware x86_64
OS GNU/Linux
Status NEW
Severity enhancement
Priority P1
Component Review Request
Assignee rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org
Reporter cybolic@gmail.com
CC rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org
Blocks 2
namespace nonfree

# Spec

https://github.com/Cybolic/rpmspec-bitwig-studio/blob/master/bitwig-studio.spec


# Description

Bitwig Studio is a dynamic software for creation and performance of your
musical ideas on stage or in the studio.

This is proprietary piece of software, requiring a purchased license to
function outside of demo mode.


# rpmlint on source package

> bitwig-studio.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US workflow -> work flow, work-flow, workforce
"workflow" is how the text is written on bitwig.com.

> bitwig-studio.src: W: invalid-license EULA
From the RPM documentation, this would seem to be the valid option.

> bitwig-studio.src: W: no-%build-section
There's nothing to build, it's a repackaging.


# rpmlint on binary package

There is a lot of output from rpmlint on the binary, most of which is I don't
see a solution for since this is proprietary software.


This is my first RPM Fusion package. I'm coming from Arch and was saddened to
see that there was no easy way to install Bitwig on RPM systems.

I seem to be sponsored by basset on Fedora, but I'm new to this, so I might be
wrong.


Referenced Bugs:


You are receiving this mail because: