Bug ID | 4700 |
---|---|
Summary | Review request: bitwig-studio - A dynamic software for creation and performance of musical ideas |
Product | Package Reviews |
Version | Current |
Hardware | x86_64 |
OS | GNU/Linux |
Status | NEW |
Severity | enhancement |
Priority | P1 |
Component | Review Request |
Assignee | rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org |
Reporter | cybolic@gmail.com |
CC | rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org |
Blocks | 2 |
namespace | nonfree |
# Spec https://github.com/Cybolic/rpmspec-bitwig-studio/blob/master/bitwig-studio.spec # Description Bitwig Studio is a dynamic software for creation and performance of your musical ideas on stage or in the studio. This is proprietary piece of software, requiring a purchased license to function outside of demo mode. # rpmlint on source package > bitwig-studio.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US workflow -> work flow, work-flow, workforce "workflow" is how the text is written on bitwig.com. > bitwig-studio.src: W: invalid-license EULA From the RPM documentation, this would seem to be the valid option. > bitwig-studio.src: W: no-%build-section There's nothing to build, it's a repackaging. # rpmlint on binary package There is a lot of output from rpmlint on the binary, most of which is I don't see a solution for since this is proprietary software. This is my first RPM Fusion package. I'm coming from Arch and was saddened to see that there was no easy way to install Bitwig on RPM systems. I seem to be sponsored by basset on Fedora, but I'm new to this, so I might be wrong.