On 06/14/2013 02:28 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 22:37 -0700, Jeff Mendoza wrote:
> I elected to have openssl-freeworld and openssl-freeworld-devel
> conflict with the regular packages. openssl-freeworld has the binary
> openssl, this is not really needed, as the change is in the lib, and
> the regular openssl binary will work with openssl-freeworld-libs.
> openssl-freeworld-devel will conflict by installing the header files
> in the usual place. I had to modify the pkg-config files in the devel
> package to point to the new lib location.
Sorry, just wanting some clarification. Can the regular openssl binary
use the freeworld functions of openssl-freeworld-libs? If so, wouldn't
it make more sense to just not bother building openssl-freeworld and
only provide openssl-freeworld-libs?
Same question for openssl-freeworld-devel, could we get away with not
creating that one too?
-- Rex