Bug ID | 5499 |
---|---|
Summary | Review request: ripcord - a lightweight chat client for Slack and Discord |
Product | Package Reviews |
Version | Current |
Hardware | x86_64 |
OS | GNU/Linux |
Status | NEW |
Severity | enhancement |
Priority | P1 |
Component | Review Request |
Assignee | rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org |
Reporter | sentrycraft123@gmail.com |
CC | rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org |
Blocks | 2, 30 |
namespace | nonfree |
https://github.com/Jan200101/Ripcord-rpm/releases/download/v1.0/ripcord.spec https://github.com/Jan200101/Ripcord-rpm/releases/download/v1.0/ripcord-0.4.21-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Ripcord is a free proprietary client for Slack and Discord Why not in fedora: Ripcord is nonfree rpmlint: >ripcord.x86_64: E: devel-dependency libsodium-devel >ripcord.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsodium-devel >ripcord.x86_64: W: invalid-license Proprietary >ripcord.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ripcord/Ripcord >ripcord.x86_64: W: no-documentation >ripcord.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib64/ripcord/lib/libsodium.so.18 /usr/lib64/libsodium.so >ripcord.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib64/ripcord/plugins /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins >ripcord.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary Ripcord >ripcord.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/Ripcord.desktop /usr/bin/Ripcord >ripcord.src: W: invalid-license Proprietary >ripcord.src: W: strange-permission Ripcord-0.4.21-x86_64.AppImage 775 >2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 9 warnings. Ripcord requires libsodium.so.18 which is not in any repo so I just symlink libsodium.so do lobsodium.so.18 in the Ripcords lib directory only libsodium-devel has libsodium.so so I set that as a dependency, if someone has a better future proof solution I'm free to change it Ripcord requires a plugins directory next to its binary so I symlink it This is my first RPM Fusion package and I am still looking for a sponsor