[Bug 2483] Review request: msttcore-fonts - TrueType core fonts for the web

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2483 --- Comment #29 from Rob Janes <janes.rob(a)gmail.com&gt; 2013-05-27 12:23:41 CEST --- that rule is from fedora project. yes, i read the rpmfusion contributors document that points to it. But this rule refers to code, not font files which i believe are bitmaps more or less. font files would be termed "content", not code, and i think things are a bit different for that. here's the rule you pointed to ... ==================================== snip Packages which are not useful without external bits Some software is not functional or useful without the presence of external code dependencies in the runtime operating system environment. When those external code dependencies are non-free, legally unacceptable, or binary-only (with the exception of permissible firmware), then the dependent software is not acceptable for inclusion in Fedora. If the code dependencies are acceptable for Fedora, then they should be packaged and included in Fedora as a pre-requisite for inclusion of the dependent software. Software which downloads code bundles from the internet in order to be functional or useful is not acceptable for inclusion in Fedora (regardless of whether the downloaded code would be acceptable to be packaged in Fedora as a proper dependency). This also means that packages which are not functional or useful without code or packages from third-party sources are not acceptable for inclusion in Fedora. ==================================== snip Certainly, this is directed at packages that sidestep licensing by downloading licensed stuff rather than containing the material in the package. I would guess this is deemed most incompatible when the licensed material in question is code. This is really more a licensing rule than a rule about downloading. here's from the rpmfusion faq: http://rpmfusion.org/FAQ#Why_doesn.27t_the_Fedora_project_ship_the_Softwa... ================================== snip Why doesn't the Fedora project ship the Software that RPM Fusion offers? As Fedora is officially affiliated with Red Hat, Inc. in the Fedora Project, Fedora is effectively bound by the same legal restrictions as Red Hat, as a US company, is bound by. This means in particular that software encumbered with US patents cannot be included in Fedora. Fedora further only wants to ship software that is covered by Free and Open-Source-Software licenses; see Fedora's Licensing Guidelines and its List of Good Licenses for details. Does RPM Fusion distribute illegal software? No. RPM Fusion only distributes packages which can be legally re-distributed. =================================== snip rpmfusion exists separate from fedora as an extension of fedora, but with more flexibility with regards licensing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.