Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life to rename sdlmame to mame.
ÔÚ2010-03-16 04:49:41£¬"Julian Sikorski" <belegdol@gmail.com> дµÀ£º
>W dniu 18.01.2010 13:38, supercyper pisze:
>> I agree with Andrea that
>> the best way to do this is to make a new review request for mame.
>> SDLmame can be safely Provides/Obsoletes by mame.
>>
>> See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1593895, p7zip was
>> Provides/Obsoletes by xz-lzma-compat.
>>
>> ÔÚ2010-01-17 17:45:24£¬"Julian Sikorski" <belegdol@gmail.com> дµÀ£º
>>>W dniu 17.01.2010 10:36, Andrea Musuruane pisze:
>>>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Julian Sikorski <belegdol@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> as of 0.136u1, sdlmame has been merged with the official version - i.e.
>>>>> the SDL osd is now part of the MAME source. Thus, I'd like to request a
>>>>> package rename. What's the correct procedure to do that? Is opening a
>>>>> bug blocking the CVS admin one enough?
>>>>
>>>> I think the best way to do this is to make a new review request for
>>>> Mame that will obsolete sdlmame.
>>>>
>>>> Bye,
>>>>
>>>> Andrea.
>>>>
>>>OK, the package overhaul could definitely use a review. As a related
>>>question: is any of you using the intermediate sdlmame releases from
>>>testing? These are going to be more painful to produce, it seems, so I'm
>>>wondering if it's worth the effort.
>>>
>>>Julian
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>0.137 is out, I'll upload the new package for review in the next couple
>of days.
>
>Julian
>