--- Comment #3 from Avi Alkalay <avi(a)unix.sh> 2012-03-02 20:27:28 CET ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Dont use the %__rm, %__cp macros, use simple 'rm',
'cp' 'c++' instead
The License: tag does not reflect the fact that some code is MIT/X11
licensed. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Licensing
Couldn't find a nothing on the source that says MIT/X11 license.
You can't add COPYING yourself, you must contact upstream about
upstream has already a COPYING in place. Are you replacing it? This is not
possible either for legal reasons. After all, it's their code. If you have
problem with the fsf-address lint warning, just report to upstream, bring the
link (e. g., bugtracker ticket) in here and live with the warning.
This is old code, there is no upstream. GNU office has moved to another address
but the license file included reflects the old address and rpmlint is
complaining. I'm just overwriting with the new file because of this small
Remove Buildroot:, %clean, %defattr. These are not used in Fedora.
The Source0 url is wrong, it just fetches a html page. See
, note the sourceforge
Rpmlint shows empty debug package. Probably related to that you
remove the -g
option to g++. You should not do that, generate debug info and let rpmbuild
strip to the debug package instead. And run rpmlint on the debug package as
I can't generate debug packages. How to do that? I even removed the '-s'
(strip) from 'install' but no debug package is generated.
Write the sed code on one line (note there's only the last one
when you're done)
sed -i -e 's/g++/$CXX/g' -e 's/-g//g' -e 's/-O2/$OPTFLAGS/g'
Write the %doc list on one line:
%doc COPYING AP\ buglist.txt Using\ AtomicParsley.rtf
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.