2016-11-04 21:29 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>:
On Sex, 2016-11-04 at 08:02 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2016-11-04 4:38 GMT+01:00 Stuart Gathman <stuart(a)gathman.org>:
> >
> > On 11/02/2016 06:27 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> >
> > With the migration from older URL to
admin.rpmfusion.org/accounts
> > we
> > had an issue with new users accounts.
> >
> > This is now fixed and old URL is disabled, there is still a need to
> > build rpmfusion-packager for the new fas. So I hope someelse to
> > pick
> > the tasks so I can continue with my long list.
> >
> > I was able to create an account. Thanks!
> >
> > Now, I can't create a package request. The server never responds
> > to the
> > post, and a proxy of some kind eventually times out:
> >
> >
https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/request/package/
> Thx for reporting.
>
> So I've restarted the service, there were still probably some
> leftover
> from the fas->admin switch.
Not fixed , I think we still have the same problem.
But, I don't know what we
are talking about ?!
Having "new package" in our pkgdb never worked, so it's not a
regression, we just use another way to import package.
One have to look at the pkgdb code and adapt, specially how to detect
that a particular package was approved.
What is supposed to work in pkgdb is package acl request, so this
previously needs an admin to make the changes, it's not needed
anymore, and a maintainer that is not an admin can allow another
co-maintainer, etc.
That's the current improvement.
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)