2010/2/23 David Timms <dtimms@iinet.net.au>
On 24/02/10 07:27, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030

--- Comment #100 from Alex Lancaster<alexl@users.sourceforge.net>   2010-02-23 21:27:38 ---
(In reply to comment #99)
Ok, I'm willing to review this, but so far the only packages I've reviewed for
Fedora have been softballs and this looks like it will be pretty massive.

Excellent!   I'm sure others will also step in to help out.  Also there's been
a fair amount of "reviewing" already especially by Ralf (see the previous
almost 100 comments!) so the package has already been through the ringer
already and some of the trickier issues have already been addressed.

Is -12 current?

Yep: -12 is the most recent.

Hi, I would like to suggest that this package review (which has really been more of a packaging development bug) be closed, and a new one requested. (close duplicate after create new bug)

This would keep the normal review stuff together, and uncluttered by the preliminary package development work.

Anyone else agree/disagree ?

Cheers,
David Timms.
I don't see any problem with keeping the same bug report for the review,
That development side was fully part of the review process.
I don't see any reason to split, specially as this review seems exemplary of what work need to be achieved if a package doesn't comply with our guidelines.

Once that said, I guess a sum-up of what remain to be worked on, would be welcome for a new comer.

Nicolas (kwizart)