https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3152
--- Comment #43 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec(a)gmail.com> 2014-02-06 15:13:57 CET
---
(In reply to comment #42)
(In reply to comment #41)
> No, %global will not work, the use here requires lazy evaluation.
Wrong, you are using %name before it's defined.
Yes, that's the current
usage and the reason %define is used instead of
%global. It's a deliberate decision form my side.
Move it down after Name: and %global will start working.
Alternatively, you try to derive %reponame from %name or another common
%global.
> I have added
> a justification in the spec. Updated in-place, same links.
True. It's just
that all of these options IMHO would give a more cluttered
spec. So if the reviewer is OK with it, I'd prefer to have it as is although I
of course could modify along these lines. No big deal, at least not for me :)
Are the reasons behind the requirement to increment the NVR each time
you
change something really so difficult to comprehed?
Hey, is this personal?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Multiple_Changelog_En...
Finally, how do you plan to handle the case of 3rd parties adding
/etc/yum.repos.d/*repo files themselves?
Note: Any remote repository, at any time can do so, which at minium will break
a user's installation.
For the case there already is a repo file installed when
installing
dropbox-repo refer to
https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2014-February/...
(near bottom).
If one tries to install a package with a repo file after dropbox-repo is
insrtalled, there will be a conflict. Isn't this as it should?
User can always edit the repo file. After all, it's a configuration file.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.