I've cleaned up the spec, removing the commented out blocks. I also put all the BRs on their own lines and cleaned out some redundant ones. I also changed the ExclusiveArch tag to i686 instead of using the macro (I only used the macro to begin with because the guidelines still use the macro-- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Runtime_Dependencies). There are also a couple of other fixes that I'd pushed to my personal repository (https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/) that hadn't wound up here, so the spec release is now at .5. I suppose I probably should write an AppData file for DF as well, since it provides a graphical application. I'll get that done over the next few days. Is the license tag acceptable? Or should it say something like "Custom" instead? Source URL: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/rpmfusion/dwarffortress.spec SRPM URL: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/rpmfusion/dwarffortress-0.43.05-5.fc26.src.rpm