Re: Packages - + claiming madplay & audacity-nonfree

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 29.07.2008 00:19, David Timms wrote: > ... > nes_ntsc >> > > Which repo is the right onw for this? Free or nonfree? > I haven't taken a close enough look yet, I'll get back to you. The author says LGPL. Given that they are libraries that simulate what happens when an image is sent to an old TV, perhaps these would fit in either free or be OK for Fedora itself {just surmising} ? can I get cvs access for the above packages ? >> > > I sponsored you for CVS access. > Thanks thl ;-) I can co the modules for mpgtx, normalize and gcube OK. Actually, I realize that I'll be needing madplay as well, and since no one appears to have claimed that I'll put my hand up {and name on the initial merge page}. I'm also keen to get audacity-nonfree happening. It seems that I will need to change names {, apply provides etc} as it will be called audacity-freeworld in the rpmfusion scheme ? I request cvs module creation for those two as well if there is no objections or others already working on them. But Xavier still might need to adjust the acls before access to above > packages works properly. > Yes. When attempting to cvs-import I get: $ ./cvs-import.sh -b devel -m "Initial import of livna package" ~/src/redhat/SRPMS/normalize-0.7.7-2.fc9.src.rpm ... Please check the above cvs diff. If you want to make any changes before committing, please press Ctrl-C. Otherwise press Enter to proceed to commit. ? devel/import.log cvs commit... ? devel/import.log **** Access denied: dtimms is not in ACL for rpms/normalize/devel cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first! So I guess you are correct about the ACL perms. I noticed a relatively new wiki page on cvs requests. Is this {bugzilla entry way} now the preferred process to follow, rather than this list / personal emails to Xavier ?