http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436
--- Comment #61 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2011-10-01 14:01:57 ---
Here's the response I got from the mono mailing list:
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 14:35 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm trying to package moonlight for possible inclusion at RPM
Fusion
but I'm having some issues.
1. pkg-config problem:
I'm currently working on version 2.4.1 moonlight since it's the latest
stable. It apparently is supposed to work with mono 2.6 but 2.10 is
what F15 has, hopefully 2.6 is only a minimum.
Sadly it's not a minimum, or even a guideline - it requires the exact
expected version from its own altered 2.6 branch (based on 2.6.1, I
think). The class library build works by doing a full build of the
regular 2.6 class tree, then binary-patching the output to create
Silverlight versions of libraries from the 2.0 versions.
You'll need to bundle the appropriate 2.6 release, and mangle the build
process to handle it.
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-mono/packages/moon.git;a=blob;f=d...
is the makefile used to build the package on Ubuntu - although I've deleted the
package since it doesn't support recent Firefox, and seems to be dead upstream.
---
I don't know it's practical to keep a matched pair of moonlight & mono
around,
plus that sounds a lot like static linking of libraries. What a mess.
If we want to move forward it sounds like we'll need to add the appropriate
mono sources to this (source) package and I'm not sure RPM Fusion will allow
that...
Richard
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.