Re: coms.xml as currently in livna breaks yum groupinstall
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
As I said, I don't want to do that:
I understand, but I just wanted to verify it /would/ work, not to
discuss implementing it. I'm not even involved in RPM Fusion all that
much, I won't tell you what to do ;-)
>> I doubt filling a bug against yum will help. Fedora likely
will tell us
>> to use the same group-id then Fedora. I'd like to avoid that, as it will
>> be harder for people to find RPM Fusions packages. And there are
>> problems in anaconda as well, as you will get packages marked as
>> "<packagereq type="default">" only if you unselected
and reselect a group.
How about a separate category for RPM Fusion packages? You would need to
try to not use the same group.name, and not the same group.groupid.
Sounds reasonable and doable, don't you think?
Again, just an idea / my $0.02
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip