Why not build same version with fresh gcc and other devel package?
On Seg, 2016-10-17 at 09:24 +0000, Vascom wrote:
> When I run
> dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25
> I see
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates',
> disabling.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates',
> disabling.
>
> May be add empty f25 updates repo as on main Fedora?
Yes, rpmfusion-free-updates and rpmfusion-nonfree-updates should be
initialized, but will be empty until GA (General Available, 15/11/2016)
> And some packages in f25 development repo still has fc24 suffix. May
> be inform their maintainers that need quick rebuild this packages for
> F25 and rawhide.
F25 don't had one mass rebuild , so it is normal have fc24 suffixes in
f25 and rawhide (f26)
> пн, 17 окт. 2016 г. в 12:09, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com>:
> > 2016-10-17 9:49 GMT+02:00 Vascom <vascom2@gmail.com>:
> > > May be it is time to create rpmfusion repos for F25? So users can
> > now simply
> > > upgrade their systems to Fedora 25 Beta.
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure to understand what's your issue actually ? And why you
> > make you think the repo aren't there.
> > We are in the development/25 layout:
> > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/development/25/Everyt
> > hing/x86_64/os/
> >
> > And we also have the development/rawhide repo published for f26
> > already.
> >
> > So really, please report your workflow that makes you think the
> > repos
> > aren't there, it's important to undersand.
> >
> > Thx
> >
> >
> > --
> > -
> >
> > Nicolas (kwizart)
> >
--
Sérgio M. B.