On 16/08/16 11:28, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
> Do you mean report FSF address issue not to deadbeef upstream but to
> libs/plugins upstream?
> I am report this to deadbeef author and he don't want correct this.
> https://github.com/Alexey-Yakovenko/deadbeef/issues/901
>
> As described here
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address I
> can correct this files.

Well, my Russian isn't  what it should be. That said, to change all
those addresses is a lot of work, and I can understand upstream if they
refuse for that reason. I certainly would if I were not also a packager.

I have a simple script which I use now and then to prepare a patch.
Sending the same issue as a pull request might be better, at least
sometimes. Script is at http://paste.fedoraproject.org/409122/14713410.
Of course, the output must be reviewed and cleaned up, but it usually
saves a lot of work


Cheers!

--alec