Re: replacement builder needed
On 24/10/11 05:02, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm sure there are some technical hurdles but a distributed
approach
may keep us from having to come up with a dedicated builder.
What does everyone think?
I wouldn't mind doing so, but I don't think the
machine side is that
hard from the sound of it. More problematic is how to provide enough
bandwidth, and total usage. Do we have a feel for the BW / monthly data
usage side of the equation ?