@jeremy Any updates on this package ? I indeed think this would be more appropriate to have the chromium-freeworld package because: - it's simpler - it's assume we try to complement chromium as a whole, not only certain feature subset of chromium libraries. - if chromium needs another set of feature to complement, such as crypto algo, then we would need to complement in the same chromium-freeworld package I would expect. BTW, is there any package linking to chromium-libs-media ? I don't get the point to have a separate -media sub-package in fedora in the first step. Thx for your work on this.