Comment # 3 on bug 4363 from Nicolas Chauvet

@jeremy
Any updates on this package ?

I indeed think this would be more appropriate to have the chromium-freeworld
package because:
- it's simpler
- it's assume we try to complement chromium as a whole, not only certain
feature subset of chromium libraries.
- if chromium needs another set of feature to complement, such as crypto algo,
then we would need to complement in the same chromium-freeworld package I would
expect.

BTW, is there any package linking to chromium-libs-media ? I don't get the
point to have a separate -media sub-package in fedora in the first step.

Thx for your work on this.