http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436
--- Comment #29 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-11 10:55:50 ---
I still don't like the way the spec sort it's different part.
Specially having %file section before the %install ones
Why are theses options not using the usual %configure macro ?
%{?env_options}
%{?configure_options}
Why aren't you using a dist tag. Please use one. it definitely make sense to
have a dist tag for binary package. (even for a noarch packages that was built
using a special version of rpm)
About this:
rm %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libmoon.so
rm %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/moon/plugin/*.la
rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/pkgconfig
* Why this symlink is deleted ?
* You should probably use that to remove .la in subdirectory (if any).
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';'
* Why are you removing pkgconfig ?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.