http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740
solarflow99(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|2 |3
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from solarflow99(a)gmail.com 2010-11-25 09:10:42 ---
ok, I don't see a special group for reviewers, so i'll assume I can do it.
Taking this package for review.
rpmlint output is OK, I just see this one warning (W):
meka.src: W: invalid-license Distributable
The value of the License tag was not recognized.
I assume this license is OK right? Just a few minor ideas to consider for the
spec file, perhaps the blank line between Summary and Group can be moved and
put after URL instead, double spaces between macros such as %description,
%build, etc. tabs can align the values instead of a space to look something
like this:
Source2: %{name}.desktop
Source3: freedos-source.tar.gz
Group: Applications/Emulators
Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
BuildRequires: bison
BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils
BuildRequires: xorg-x11-font-utils
Requires: hicolor-icon-theme
All this looks good after this, I can set block to: approved, and this package
will be available.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.