Re: about mame

On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 14:53 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 16.01.2012 14:48, Sérgio Basto pisze: >> Hi, so if I do : >> >> yum list \*mame\* >> >> Installed Packages >> gmameui.x86_64 0.2.10-1.fc12 @rpmfusion-nonfree >> mame.x86_64 0.144u5-1.fc16 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing >> mame-tools.x86_64 0.144u5-1.fc16 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing >> qmc2-sdlmame.x86_64 0.34-1.fc16 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates >> sdlmame-data.noarch 0144-1.fc16 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing >> sdlmame-data-artwork.noarch 0120-3.fc11 @rpmfusion-nonfree >> sdlmame-data-roms.noarch 0120-3.fc11 @rpmfusion-nonfree >> Available Packages >> sdlmame.x86_64 0136-1.fc13 rpmfusion-nonfree >> sdlmame-data-samples.noarch 0139-1.fc14 rpmfusion-nonfree >> sdlmame-tools.x86_64 0136-1.fc13 rpmfusion-nonfree >> >> First question : what mame-data should be installed ? 120 or 136/9 or >> all or none ? >> Second sdlmame.x86_64 shouldn't be deleted ? since has been deprecated, >> IIRC, and others sdl-mame-data that are obsoleted ? . >> >> Thanks, > sdlmame is obsoleted by mame: > Provides: sdlmame = 0%{baseversion}-%{release} > Obsoletes: sdlmame < 0136-2 > So I am not sure how you have managed to install both. not installed !, is in "Available Packages" list

> Available Packages > sdlmame.x86_64 0136-1.fc13 rpmfusion-nonfree > sdlmame-data-samples.noarch 0139-1.fc14 rpmfusion-nonfree > sdlmame-tools.x86_64 0136-1.fc13 rpmfusion-nonfree > The sdlmame-data packages are pretty unrelated to each other, they > distribute content. I was considering retiring those but given that the > maintenance overhead is pretty low, they are still in the repos. so have install this 4 aren't a problem ;-) sdlmame-data.noarch sdlmame-data-artwork.noarch sdlmame-data-roms.noarch sdlmame-data-samples.noarch Thanks,