Hi, 

On Sáb, 2015-11-28 at 23:02 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>
>
> 2015-11-28 21:32 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto <sergio@serjux.com>:
> > Need updates :
>  
> >  F21:
> > sonic-visualiser-2.4.1-2.fc21.src.rpm
> > sonic-visualiser-freeworld-2.1-2.fc21.src.rpm
> > F22:
> > sonic-visualiser-2.4.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
> > sonic-visualiser-freeworld-2.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
> > F23:
> > sonic-visualiser-2.4.1-4.fc23.src.rpm
> > sonic-visualiser-freeworld-2.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
> Sorry, I don't understand all this.
> What question are you trying to answear ?
>
> Because the question is not:" is the package rebuild for f23" ? but
> instead:
> Is the package at the correct version in f23 (in a first step).
> If already at the correct version, can we keep the same build as f22
> or rebuilt it for f23 (the reason for the rebuild is because it's c++
> and/or there is a soname bump for it's dependencies).
>
> if you want me do to something, I need a "list " for free section and
> the list for the nonfree section.

This is a comprehensive list of all freeworld packages that are in
Rpmfusion and the counter-part in Fedora. I also sent the corrects
cases to show that I reviewed *all* freeworld packages.

I checked F23 and also F21 and F22 , because in some cases I don't know
if it need updates, for example k3b .


Mini manual (for maintainers) to update his packages :

For updates F22 and F23 the workflow is as follow:
- The maintainer which want update his package, clone his package from
github [1], modify in his account what wants and when finish block
tracker bug #3820, to sync with git preview. 
- Provenpackager will update to git preview and move to the tracker bug
#3821 to build and publish .   

Please open a bug report, don't need to write more than name of the
package and location of modifications, is just to use the "blocks" of
bugzilla.
Of course this is temporary, until infra support acls ... 

I will send a new list of the freeworld packages soon . 
  
[1] https://github.com/rpmfusion/yourpackage


Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.