Comment # 21 on bug 4286 from Patrick Griffis

(In reply to Sérgio Basto from comment #20)
> (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #19)
> > If you want to offer users a real RPM without LPF, the repository you are
> > currently shipping the package in is really the only way to go (as they
> > don't seem to care about license compliance at all, unlike RPM Fusion).
> 
> you mean unitedrpms ? flash_player_ppapi_linux.x86_64.tar.gz got an LGPLv3
> license , can you you comment if is distributable or not ? please .

Their license says the use LGPLv3 libraries. The LGPL does not require software
that links to it to be open source.