http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310
--- Comment #24 from Mikhail Kalenkov <Mikhail.Kalenkov(a)gmail.com> 2009-06-18
09:43:06 ---
(In reply to comment #23)
SPEC -
http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/fusion/scid.spec
SRPM -
http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/fusion/scid-3.7.3-8.fc11.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #22)
> Done. I found that src/tcl/contrib/ezsmtp/* files have a nonGPL license
> (tcl/contrib/ezsmtp/license.txt). I wrote in spec file that they are "freely
> distributable". Is it correct?
>
No, that is a BSD style license which is *compatible* with GPL [1]. That code
ends up in the final scid executable. GPL is stricter than BSD and the stricter
license wins [2]. The scid authors decided to link this BSD code to GPL code
and they have the right to do so because of the GPL-compatibility. The
resulting file will be GPL. Well, GPLv2+ in this case.
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses
[2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_should_I_handle_multiple...
Thanks for the clarification.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.