https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
--- Comment #12 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-08-17
16:11:04 CEST ---
I noticed that versioning was counting either on .git or OBS_OVERRIDE_VERSION
to provide correct version (otherwise it was set to 0.0.1), so I used latter
which is appropriate for packaging. Also, upstream released OBS-studio 0.11.4
Updated .src.rpm and .spec files:
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.11.4-0.1/obs-studio-0.11.4-0.1.fc21...
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.11.4-0.1/obs-studio.spec
rpmlint outputs:
$ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.11.4-0.1.fc21.src.rpm
obs-studio.src:56: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so*
obs-studio.src:79: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs
obs-studio.src:84: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.11.4-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share
/usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux
obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.11.4-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.11.4-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.