I prefer to keep a distinct SPEC for Pidora in order to avoid otherOn Tue 02 Sep 2014 07:43:13 PM CEST, Rex Dieter wrote:
> On 09/02/2014 12:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 09/02/2014 06:11 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> On 08/31/2014 04:02 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> On 08/30/2014 03:43 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>>>> 2014-08-30 15:20 GMT+02:00 Antonio <sagitter@rpmfusion.org
>>>>> <mailto:sagitter@rpmfusion.org>>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Author: sagitter
>>>>>
>>>>> Update of /cvs/free/rpms/moc/F-20 In directory
>>>>> old02.ovh.rpmfusion.lan:/tmp/cvs-serv12275/F-20
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified Files: .cvsignore moc.spec sources Log Message: Update
>>>>> to new stable release 2.5.0 .
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ..
>>>>>
>>>>> ## Source archive from svn #2641; obtained by: ## svn co
>>>>> svn://daper.net/moc/trunk <http://daper.net/moc/trunk> -## tar
>>>>> -czvf moc-2.5.0-14.beta2.tar.gz trunk -Source0:
>>>>> %{name}-%{version}-14.beta2.tar.gz +## tar -czvf
>>>>> moc-2.5.0-17.beta2.tar.gz trunk +## Source0:
>>>>> %%{name}-%%{version}-17.beta2.tar.gz + +Source0:
>>>>> http://ftp.daper.net/pub/soft/moc/stable/moc-2.5.0.tar.bz2
>>>>>
>>>>> version macro.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +%ifnarch armv6hl armv7hl +BuildRequires: ffmpeg-devel
>>>>> +BuildRequires: libmad-devel +%endif
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> At least you can use %{arm} architectural macro, but can you
>>>>> explain why it would not be enabled on ARM ? At least it does
>>>>> build perfecly fine until now.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They're related to RPMs built outside RPMFusion, but for Pidora.
>>>
>>> Pidora supports armv7hl these days?
>>
>> No.
>
> OK, then just do:
>
> %ifnarch armv6hl
>
> and leave out the armv7hl bit that affects fedora.
>
mistakes in future.
Thanks for your tip.