(In reply to leigh scott from comment #21) > (In reply to Andrea Musuruane from comment #20) > > (In reply to leigh scott from comment #19) > > > (In reply to Andrea Musuruane from comment #0) > > > > > > > Why not in Fedora: > > > > Emulators are not allowed in Fedora > > > > > > > > > A few issues > > > > > > 1. Why does this qualify to be in rpmfusion? > > > > a) MAME license is nonfree because "Redistributions may not be sold, nor may > > they be used in a commercial product or activity." > > > > b) cannonball is a C++ rewrite based in the original OutRun ROMs > > decompilation (i.e. this is not a clean room rewrite like Wine): > > http://reassembler.blogspot.it/2012/12/cannonball-source-code-release.html > > > > The license looks like BSD to me You are completely mistaken. Cannonball license: https://github.com/djyt/cannonball/blob/master/docs/license.txt Since when the BSD license does **NOT** allow commercial redistribution??? Old MAME license (now MAME is GPLv2+): https://www.openhub.net/licenses/MAME%E2%84%A2_Distribution_License They are identical, word by word. BSD licenses: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses