Re: Legal opinion : partly non free graphics

I'm afraid the steering committee is pretty much non functional, and I'm not sure that is going to change (yes that is a problem, volunteers ?) But for this specific case I think that what we need is something akin to Debian's ftpmasters. Since the persons hosting the stuff are the ones who are exposed to the most legal risk (I think IANAL). So I would like to suggest the following procedure for cases like this: 1) We need a list of people hosting files   (Question, do we count builders in this ?, or just public servers    serving rpmfusion "content")   (Note this step is a one time exercise, if we keep an up2date list of    this on the wiki after this) 2) When something like this happens, those people need to vote, if we prefer anonymous voting, I suggest an independent third party sends out please enter your vote mails, and collect answers. 3) If there are no "no votes", the package can get in, otherwise it cannot. Yes this makes no a veto, but that seems the reasonable way here.