On Seg, 2015-12-07 at 14:36 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
On Qui, 2015-12-03 at 21:41 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With Fedora 21 gone End Of Life on 1st December, I've made the very
> last push for f21 earlier today.
>
> Given that CVS is still pointing to F-21, there is no branch to
> push
> into CVS anymore.
> But since few months, the CVS content is synchronized to an
> internal
> git preview infrastructure that is automatically forwarded to
>
github.com/rpmfusion
>
> The current work-flow, until the new infra is setup will be to
> clone
> (or fork) from github and push to your personal namespace or attach
> the patch (in git am usable form) and block
https://bugzilla.rpmfus
> io
> n.org/3820.
> We don't proceed github pull request, those aren't forwarded yet,
> so
> you really need to block #3820 with a new bug (creating bugs in our
> bugzilla is still cheap). I will have a short list of people able
> to
> forward content to R/W internal git preview that is then forwarded
> to
> github as R/O.
Just clarify this workflow , if you fork
github.com/rpmfusion/yourpackage to yours github account or other
public repo, you just need tell in bug report where his your repo
(typo here ) you just need to tell in bug report where is your repo
with
yours changes because as provenpackager, I can fetch your fork and
merge into our git [1] .
[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14872486/retrieve-specific-commit-
fr
om-a-remote-git-repository/31460870#31460870
> I will probably update the wiki to reflect that until the new tools
> and infra are available.
>
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors
Yes, we should update Contributors page. And also, IMO , add a
message
in every open bug in bugzilla with product=Fedora [2] with the page
of
wiki with new workflow , to ensure all maintainers are informed .
[
2] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&
li
st_id=8504&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&pro
du
ct=Fedora
> Current priority is:
> 1/ setup the new infra to push git content using rfpkg-free/rfpkg-
> nonfree. (gitolite)
> Recently has an issue with fasClient that should be fixed now. Need
> time to work on it.
> 2/ Close the f23 repository for release and move to updates.
> 3/ Introduce new packages from the review queue. (so if you don't
> know how to help, please have a look on the review request queue
> http
>
s://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/2).
IMO also branching f23, rawhide and epel7
kwizart: people still trying fix things that can't , and the main thing
for them is got git sources correct , why we don't do branch f23 , do
the mass rebuild, see
github.com/rpmfusion correctly and "Close the f23
repository for release and move to updates." , internals things don't
matter to the people , this ones makes many questions and people try to
fix it (without success) Martin ask for rebuilds now Jeremy made f23
branch in is own account and I don't know what to answer.
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.