On 03/04/2011 04:57 PM, Jack Neely wrote:
Secondly, many more experienced AFS administrators prefer the old
Transarc style paths over the FHS paths that my packages use. I would
like to create an openafs-transarc sub-package that includes the
symlinks that would enable these non-standard paths. (Specifically,
/usr/afs and /usr/vice.)
No way, never.
The first issue with the static libs really needs to happen. The
issue is just pure annoyance but will make these packages more usable to
certain folks. I'd like to do both. Are there any comments or reason
why I should not?
Because this "transarc style" doesn't comply to the FHS.