[Bug 1351] Review request: frogatto - An old-school 2D platform game
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1351
--- Comment #10 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-01 12:54:18 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Mix good license part and bad license part is not a good idea,
that's why we
have a gstreamer-bad-nonfree package in rpmfusion(linking free part with
nonfree libs). Fedora is strictly forbidden of shipping nonfree files in source
tarballs.
Various gstreamer* packages are independent and I see a reason for splitting
them. Moreover they are not produced by the same spec. So the analogy is quite
poor IMHO.
Also, many game engines are shared by multiple game datas, so even
free game
datas are normally packaged separately in fedora. Debian even split this game
into two source packages instead of two binary subpackages.
AFAIK Debian policies are different than ours. For example they have the engine
in free and the data in nonfree. That is something we (in RPM Fusion) cannot
have. Both must go in nonfree:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors
"A free package that depends on a nonfree package goes to this repository
[nonfree] too. "
Anyway, I think this discussion has been long enough. If the reviewer will ask
to produce a subpackage with only the data in it I'll do it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.