Re: [Bug 3152] Review request: dropbox-repo - 3rd-party repo package for Dropbox client

On Qua, 2014-01-29 at 11:22 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: > On 1/29/14, RPM Fusion Bugzilla <noreply(a)rpmfusion.org&gt; wrote: > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3152 > > > > --- Comment #38 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com&gt; 2014-01-29 > > 08:56:22 > > CET --- > > (In reply to comment #30) > >> > > Less legal/policy concerns but will give more work to develop. > > Not necessarily. See spot's comment in comment #31 link. Basically, if > we just points to a repo provided by an ISV like Dropbox it's actually > the ISV which is distributing. If we repackage it we becomes more > responsible for the contents. > > > what you mean with "Although we comply with the GL" ? > The whole idea witjh the current GL is that we should not make > packages from "foreign" repos available, with FESCO/Fedora Legal > providing exemptions in some cases. lpf is an exception, but it has > beed reviewed and discussed within the FPC. > > > if I have time in future I'll will try do frp idea, as a sub project of > > lpf > > :) > Contributions always welcome! That said, it will probably need a new > discussion with FPC since this is an entirely new way of handling this > sensitive area. > > Again: this request is more like a test of the legal/policy > ramifications for packaged yum configurations in rpmfusion. Anyone, > out there? Sorry, above all, what means "GL" ? Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B.