http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588
--- Comment #10 from Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info> 2009-05-17 14:06:17
---
(In reply to comment #9)
I think it should go to the free repo.
FWIW, I have no strong option, but I more and more tend to say: let's put it
into the nonfree repo, because the result of what this is building has nonfree
packages available.
Alternate solution: Provide rpmfusion-free-remix-kickstarts and
rpmfusion-nonfree-remix-kickstarts; the later package mainly could just include
the kickstart files from the former and add the nonfree repo.
Have a closer look at the rpmfusion-nonfree-release package. It
neither
contains nonfree bits nor does it depend on a nonfree package. Hence I believe
that rpmfusion-nonfree-release should be in the free repo too.
Can't really follow the "Hence I believe..." part.
rpmfusion-nonfree-release
makes nonfree package available to the system and hence is in the nonfree repo,
even if it itself is free. I think this is a good thing, as it makes it obvious
"you are crossing a line here", which IMHO is needed, as you might violate
licenses (like "non-commercial" clauses) if you blindly use stuff from the
nonfree repo.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.