http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Thienemann <andreas(a)bawue.net> 2008-11-07 00:22:06 ---
Thanks conrad, this looks _much_ better then the package initially submitted to
fedora.
As a note:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461385 contains my
initial notes at fedora and explains why that package is not suitable for
fedora.
Some notes.
OK - source files match upstream:
cd2e7e5ea479d50982b08334b1f4477a6620e6b45bc79ab55ddd07b128c64611
hydra-5.4-src.tar.gz
OK - package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK - specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
OK - dist tag is present.
OK - build root is correct.
NOK - license field matches the actual license.
While the code is GPLv2, there's a LICENCE.HYDRA file adding additional
stipulations. Please change the License tag accordingly. GPLv2 with additional
limitations might be an acceptable alternative. This also means, hydra goes
into nonfree.
OK - license text included in package.
I haven't checked the rest, will do that tomorrow.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.