https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2133
Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt(a)hotmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |alexjnewt(a)hotmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt(a)hotmail.com> 2012-01-23 16:37:00 CET
---
Few quick things I noticed while skimming through your SPEC:
*It seems a little redundant to do prep on both sources, if only one is
required, it seems unnecessary. I'm not sure how one should handle this but it
did strike me as odd when I saw it.
*You have not included documentation in your package. At a quick glance of the
source, I have noticed there is license files and a readme in the tar's. All of
these are documentation and should be included, no?
*You haven't given any reason for ignoring the warnings you did. It makes it a
little difficult to review a package with warnings that has no explanation of
such warnings being ignored. Only the warning of lack of documentation is what
I would think needs explaining, but definitely something to note next time to
avoid things from being unclear to the reviewers.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.