http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436
--- Comment #31 from Ismael Olea <ismael(a)olea.org> 2009-05-04 16:21:04 ---
(In reply to comment #29)
Why are theses options not using the usual %configure macro ?
%{?env_options}
%{?configure_options}
I removed this.
Why aren't you using a dist tag. Please use one. it definitely
make sense to
have a dist tag for binary package. (even for a noarch packages that was built
using a special version of rpm)
I don't understand: I'm using it:
«Release: 5%{?dist}
(Maybe I'd only forgot to update the spec at my website).
About this:
>rm %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libmoon.so
>rm %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/moon/plugin/*.la
>rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/pkgconfig
* Why this symlink is deleted ?
* You should probably use that to remove .la in subdirectory (if any).
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';'
* Why are you removing pkgconfig ?
Because, as said, I'm building only Silverlight 1 support.
When v2 support be more stable I'll work on that and I'll add the needed devel
package too.
Updated files:
http://olea.org/tmp/moonlight.spec
http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/mono/
Love to see this approved O:-D
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.