https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2098
--- Comment #25 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt(a)hotmail.com> 2012-02-21 21:38:00 CET
---
(In reply to comment #24)
Same goes for
fedorapeople.org IIRC.
Yeah
fedorapeople.org has the same rules as the fedora repos.
(In reply to comment #23)
(In reply to comment #22)
> > But as Julian said, use koji to build Fedora packages not RPMFusion packages,
> > as RPMFusion packages tend to depend on things that aren't a part of
Fedora.
>
> That, and in extreme cases it might put Fedora at legal risk since the
> questionable content is being hosted on their servers.
I got the message... It was a mistake, probably caused by inexperience combined
with switching between RH and RPMFusion too rapidly, too many things in the
air. I am sorry, really.
Haha, it's alright, it's quite alright, no harm done and nothing that
couldn't
have been fixed anyway. :)
(In reply to comment #21)
Git is no problem at all. But you need to show to complete sequence of
commands
leading up to the tarball.
Fair enough, that makes sense; I'll include that in my next rev. I'll just use
second source, as that probably makes the most amount of sense.
Talking to upstream is of course never wrong. In the meantime,
can't you just
remove these and replace with symlinks to system headers in %prep?
Yeah I was going to try that first but I'm not sure if that will work to be
honest. I think it may mess up the debug package but that is a bit of a blind
guess lol. None the less, I'm going to report it upstream in hopes it gets
fixed in the next stable version.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.